IBND vs. SUSC
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) and iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSC).
IBND and SUSC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBND is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate x USD >$1B: Corporate Bond. It was launched on May 19, 2010. SUSC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate ESG Focus Index. It was launched on Jul 11, 2017. Both IBND and SUSC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IBND or SUSC.
Key characteristics
| IBND | SUSC | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -4.32% | -3.03% |
| 1Y Return | 1.89% | 2.02% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -7.00% | -3.31% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -2.24% | 0.75% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.07 | 0.09 |
| Daily Std Dev | 8.77% | 7.45% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.63% | -22.42% |
| Current Drawdown | -22.43% | -13.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBND and SUSC is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IBND vs. SUSC - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IBND achieves a -4.32% return, which is significantly lower than SUSC's -3.03% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBND vs. SUSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBND has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SUSC's 0.18% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IBND vs. SUSC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) and iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IBND vs. SUSC - Dividend Comparison
IBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than SUSC's 3.80% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF | 2.26% | 2.08% | 0.54% | 0.37% | 0.33% | 0.58% | 0.71% | 0.34% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 1.63% | 1.24% |
SUSC iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF | 3.80% | 3.83% | 2.97% | 2.21% | 2.19% | 3.07% | 3.89% | 1.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IBND vs. SUSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBND drawdown since its inception was -35.63%, which is greater than SUSC's maximum drawdown of -22.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBND and SUSC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IBND vs. SUSC - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) has a higher volatility of 2.46% compared to iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSC) at 1.86%. This indicates that IBND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SUSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.