PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBND vs. VGCAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBND vs. VGCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) and Vanguard Global Credit Bond Fund Admiral Shares (VGCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBND achieves a -2.31% return, which is significantly lower than VGCAX's 1.16% return.


IBND

1D
-0.32%
1M
-1.13%
YTD
-2.31%
6M
-2.34%
1Y
0.30%
3Y*
5.72%
5Y*
-1.40%
10Y*
0.70%

VGCAX

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.78%
YTD
1.16%
6M
1.31%
1Y
5.17%
3Y*
6.21%
5Y*
1.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBND vs. VGCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IBND
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF
-2.31%16.17%-2.81%10.38%-19.44%-8.40%11.50%4.41%1.13%
VGCAX
Vanguard Global Credit Bond Fund Admiral Shares
1.16%7.30%3.99%9.22%-13.43%-0.64%10.81%13.05%0.96%

Correlation

The correlation between IBND and VGCAX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2018

0.51

The correlation between IBND and VGCAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.63 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBND vs. VGCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBND
IBND Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
IBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBND Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
IBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBND Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

VGCAX
VGCAX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
VGCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
VGCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBND vs. VGCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) and Vanguard Global Credit Bond Fund Admiral Shares (VGCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBNDVGCAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.29

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.04

1.85

-1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.11

6.13

-6.02

IBND vs. VGCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBND Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the VGCAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBND and VGCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBND vs. VGCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBND drawdown since its inception was -35.62%, which is greater than VGCAX's maximum drawdown of -18.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBND and VGCAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBNDVGCAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.62%

-18.63%

-16.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.75%

-2.90%

-3.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.18%

-4.00%

-5.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.49%

-18.63%

-14.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.57%

-0.59%

-9.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.63%

-4.32%

-6.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

0.87%

+1.77%

Volatility

IBND vs. VGCAX - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) has a higher volatility of 2.06% compared to Vanguard Global Credit Bond Fund Admiral Shares (VGCAX) at 0.92%. This indicates that IBND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBNDVGCAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.06%

0.92%

+1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.32%

2.65%

+3.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.03%

3.30%

+4.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.75%

5.07%

+4.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.92%

4.83%

+4.09%

IBND vs. VGCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBND has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VGCAX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBND vs. VGCAX - Dividend Comparison

IBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, less than VGCAX's 4.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBND
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF
2.77%2.49%2.61%2.08%0.54%0.38%0.45%0.67%0.71%0.34%0.01%0.01%
VGCAX
Vanguard Global Credit Bond Fund Admiral Shares
4.94%4.91%4.65%4.48%2.72%3.16%4.65%6.88%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBND and VGCAX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBND has higher volatility (2.06%) compared to VGCAX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBND dropped -35.62% vs VGCAX's -18.63%.

VGCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBND and VGCAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer