IBND vs. BNDX
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX).
IBND and BNDX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBND is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate x USD >$1B: Corporate Bond. It was launched on May 19, 2010. BNDX is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Float-Adjusted Index (Hedged). It was launched on May 31, 2013. Both IBND and BNDX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IBND or BNDX.
Key characteristics
| IBND | BNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -3.99% | -1.41% |
| 1Y Return | 1.60% | 3.10% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -6.89% | -2.13% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -2.18% | 0.01% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -2.13% | 1.97% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.26 | 0.81 |
| Daily Std Dev | 8.69% | 4.90% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.63% | -16.23% |
| Current Drawdown | -22.17% | -8.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBND and BNDX is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
IBND vs. BNDX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IBND achieves a -3.99% return, which is significantly lower than BNDX's -1.41% return. Over the past 10 years, IBND has underperformed BNDX with an annualized return of -2.13%, while BNDX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.97% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBND vs. BNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBND has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDX's 0.07% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IBND vs. BNDX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IBND vs. BNDX - Dividend Comparison
IBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than BNDX's 4.69% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF | 2.46% | 2.08% | 0.54% | 0.37% | 0.33% | 0.58% | 0.71% | 0.34% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 1.63% | 1.24% |
BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | 4.69% | 4.42% | 1.51% | 3.74% | 1.11% | 3.40% | 3.01% | 2.23% | 1.89% | 1.63% | 1.54% | 0.86% |
Drawdowns
IBND vs. BNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBND drawdown since its inception was -35.63%, which is greater than BNDX's maximum drawdown of -16.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBND and BNDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IBND vs. BNDX - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) has a higher volatility of 2.49% compared to Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) at 1.22%. This indicates that IBND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.