HUMN vs. PAVE
HUMN (Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HUMN is a Robotics fund actively managed by Roundhill, while PAVE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. HUMN is actively managed, while PAVE is passively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HUMN charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVE.
Performance
HUMN vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUMN achieves a 21.30% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 22.54% return.
HUMN
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 24.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PAVE
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 7.37%
- YTD
- 22.54%
- 6M
- 21.41%
- 1Y
- 40.83%
- 3Y*
- 25.63%
- 5Y*
- 19.69%
- 10Y*
- —
HUMN vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF | 21.30% | 20.70% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 22.54% | 12.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUMN and PAVE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.53 |
HUMN vs. PAVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HUMN
PAVE
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
HUMN
PAVE
Technology
HUMN
PAVE
Consumer Cyclical
HUMN
PAVE
-
Basic Materials
HUMN
PAVE
Communication Services
HUMN
PAVE
-
Consumer Defensive
HUMN
-
PAVE
Energy
HUMN
-
PAVE
Healthcare
HUMN
-
PAVE
-
Real Estate
HUMN
-
PAVE
-
Utilities
HUMN
-
PAVE
Financial Services
HUMN
PAVE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUMN vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank
HUMN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PAVE
HUMN vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HUMN | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.41 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.43 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HUMN vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUMN drawdown since its inception was -20.40%, smaller than the maximum PAVE drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUMN and PAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUMN | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.40% | -44.08% | +23.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.94% | 0.00% | -6.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -6.22% | +1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.27% | — |
Volatility
HUMN vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUMN | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.43% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.79% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.73% | 19.44% | +11.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.73% | 21.65% | +9.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.73% | 24.39% | +6.34% |
HUMN vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
HUMN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
HUMN vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison
HUMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than PAVE's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF | 0.60% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.75% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HUMN and PAVE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HUMN.
PAVE has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.60% for HUMN.
HUMN is categorized as Robotics, while PAVE is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HUMN and 0.47% for PAVE.
Find the right allocation for HUMN and PAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer