HUMN vs. IBOT
Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT).
HUMN and IBOT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HUMN is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Jun 25, 2025. IBOT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the BlueStar® Robotics Index. It was launched on Apr 5, 2023.
Performance
HUMN vs. IBOT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HUMN vs. IBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF | -2.38% | 19.36% |
IBOT VanEck Robotics ETF | 3.41% | 16.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUMN achieves a -2.38% return, which is significantly lower than IBOT's 3.41% return.
HUMN
- 1D
- 3.35%
- 1M
- -11.69%
- YTD
- -2.38%
- 6M
- -3.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBOT
- 1D
- 2.41%
- 1M
- -8.78%
- YTD
- 3.41%
- 6M
- 8.50%
- 1Y
- 38.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HUMN vs. IBOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HUMN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IBOT's 0.47% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HUMN vs. IBOT — Risk / Return Rank
HUMN
IBOT
HUMN vs. IBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HUMN | IBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.88 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between HUMN and IBOT is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HUMN vs. IBOT - Dividend Comparison
HUMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than IBOT's 0.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF | 0.74% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBOT VanEck Robotics ETF | 0.37% | 0.38% | 2.81% | 2.06% |
Drawdowns
HUMN vs. IBOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUMN drawdown since its inception was -20.40%, smaller than the maximum IBOT drawdown of -25.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUMN and IBOT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUMN | IBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.40% | -25.39% | +4.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.67% | -11.14% | -3.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.39% | -5.19% | +0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.25% | — |
Volatility
HUMN vs. IBOT - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HUMN | IBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.97% | 25.67% | +1.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.97% | 21.81% | +5.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.97% | 21.81% | +5.16% |