HUMN vs. IBOT

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

HUMN (Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF) and IBOT (VanEck Robotics ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HUMN is a Robotics fund actively managed by Roundhill, while IBOT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar® Robotics Index. HUMN is actively managed, while IBOT is passively managed. Over the past year, HUMN returned 28.34% vs 39.68% for IBOT. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HUMN charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IBOT.

Performance

HUMN vs. IBOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUMN achieves a 6.63% return, which is significantly lower than IBOT's 23.39% return.

HUMN

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -12.84%
• 6M: 1.79%
• YTD: 6.63%
• 1Y: 28.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBOT

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: -3.51%
• 6M: 16.15%
• YTD: 23.39%
• 1Y: 39.68%
• 3Y*: 19.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUMN vs. IBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	6.63%	20.70%
IBOT VanEck Robotics ETF	23.39%	18.00%

Correlation

The correlation between HUMN and IBOT is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.80

The correlation between HUMN and IBOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

HUMN vs. IBOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HUMN	IBOT
Industrials	38.4%	44.1%
Technology	26.6%	50.6%
Consumer Cyclical	17.4%	2.2%
Financial Services	3.6%	-
Basic Materials	3.5%	-
Communication Services	2.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	2.3%
Healthcare	-	0.8%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

HUMN vs. IBOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUMN

HUMN Risk / Return Rank: 30
HUMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
HUMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
HUMN Omega Ratio Rank: 28
HUMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
HUMN Martin Ratio Rank: 32

IBOT

IBOT Risk / Return Rank: 60
IBOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
IBOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
IBOT Omega Ratio Rank: 56
IBOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
IBOT Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUMN vs. IBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HUMN	IBOT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	1.62	-0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.33	2.22	-0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.28	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.40	2.38	-0.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.79	9.27	-5.48

HUMN vs. IBOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUMN Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the IBOT Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUMN and IBOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HUMN vs. IBOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUMN drawdown since its inception was -20.40%, smaller than the maximum IBOT drawdown of -25.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUMN and IBOT.

Drawdown Indicators

	HUMN	IBOT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.40%	-25.39%	+4.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.40%	-16.74%	-3.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.19%	-5.93%	-12.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.21%	-4.98%	-0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.50%	4.29%	+3.21%

Volatility

HUMN vs. IBOT - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) has a higher volatility of 16.10% compared to VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) at 10.05%. This indicates that HUMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HUMN	IBOT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.10%	10.05%	+6.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.69%	20.69%	+8.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.85%	24.54%	+9.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.26%	22.74%	+10.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.26%	22.74%	+10.52%

HUMN vs. IBOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUMN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IBOT's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

HUMN vs. IBOT - Dividend Comparison

HUMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, more than IBOT's 0.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.68%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%
IBOT VanEck Robotics ETF	0.31%	0.38%	2.81%	2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HUMN and IBOT in my portfolio?

HUMN and IBOT have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HUMN or IBOT?

HUMN has higher volatility (16.10%) compared to IBOT (10.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUMN dropped -20.40% vs IBOT's -25.39%.

Which ETF is better, HUMN or IBOT?

On 1-year performance, IBOT leads with 39.68% vs 28.34% for HUMN. On fees, IBOT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, IBOT has been the lower-risk option at 10.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HUMN or IBOT?

Over the 1-year period, IBOT has performed better with a 39.68% return vs 28.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HUMN or IBOT?

IBOT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HUMN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HUMN or IBOT?

HUMN has the higher dividend yield at 0.68%, compared with 0.31% for IBOT.

What is the main difference between HUMN and IBOT?

HUMN is categorized as Robotics, while IBOT is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HUMN and 0.47% for IBOT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.