HUMN vs. BOTT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

HUMN (Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF) and BOTT (Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF) are both Robotics funds. HUMN is actively managed, while BOTT is passively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HUMN charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BOTT.

Performance

HUMN vs. BOTT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HUMN having a 20.96% return and BOTT slightly lower at 20.28%.

HUMN

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -3.91%
• YTD: 20.96%
• 6M: 23.38%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BOTT

• 1D: -2.58%
• 1M: -7.41%
• YTD: 20.28%
• 6M: 24.39%
• 1Y: 76.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUMN vs. BOTT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	20.96%	20.70%
BOTT Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF	20.28%	42.37%

Correlation

The correlation between HUMN and BOTT is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.80

HUMN vs. BOTT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HUMN	BOTT
Industrials	36.7%	42.0%
Technology	26.2%	19.0%
Consumer Cyclical	18.4%	11.3%
Basic Materials	6.9%	-
Communication Services	2.1%	-
Financial Services	0.1%	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

HUMN vs. BOTT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUMN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BOTT

BOTT Risk / Return Rank: 53
BOTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
BOTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
BOTT Omega Ratio Rank: 52
BOTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
BOTT Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUMN vs. BOTT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HUMN	BOTT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.01	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.66	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.32	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.50	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.30	—

Drawdowns

HUMN vs. BOTT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUMN drawdown since its inception was -20.40%, smaller than the maximum BOTT drawdown of -30.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUMN and BOTT.

Drawdown Indicators

	HUMN	BOTT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.40%	-30.74%	+10.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-30.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.19%	-19.50%	+12.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.61%	-7.03%	+2.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	12.17%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HUMN	BOTT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.13%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	31.85%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.67%	38.22%	-7.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.67%	33.57%	-2.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.67%	33.57%	-2.90%

HUMN vs. BOTT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUMN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BOTT's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

HUMN vs. BOTT - Dividend Comparison

HUMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, more than BOTT's 0.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BOTT Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.11%	0.14%	1.74%
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.60%	0.72%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HUMN and BOTT in my portfolio?

HUMN and BOTT have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HUMN or BOTT?

On fees, BOTT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HUMN or BOTT?

BOTT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HUMN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HUMN or BOTT?

HUMN has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.11% for BOTT.

What is the main difference between HUMN and BOTT?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HUMN and 0.35% for BOTT.