HUMN vs. KOID

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

HUMN (Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF) and KOID (KraneShares Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HUMN is a Robotics fund actively managed by Roundhill, while KOID is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MerQube Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index. HUMN is actively managed, while KOID is passively managed. Over the past year, HUMN returned 20.41% vs 38.95% for KOID. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. HUMN charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for KOID.

Performance

HUMN vs. KOID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and KraneShares Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index ETF (KOID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUMN achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly lower than KOID's 14.89% return.

HUMN

• 1D: 2.63%
• 1M: -10.54%
• 6M: -6.93%
• YTD: 0.67%
• 1Y: 20.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.47%

KOID

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: -9.05%
• 6M: 8.58%
• YTD: 14.89%
• 1Y: 38.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 38.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	$4.01M	$4.09M	$4.51M
KOID KraneShares Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index ETF	$4.85M	$7.23M	$7.43M

HUMN vs. KOID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.67%	20.70%
KOID KraneShares Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index ETF	14.89%	23.52%

Correlation

The correlation between HUMN and KOID is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.87

The correlation between HUMN and KOID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

HUMN vs. KOID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HUMN	KOID
Industrials	44.4%	37.0%
Technology	20.9%	43.5%
Consumer Cyclical	17.4%	14.8%
Financial Services	3.0%	-
Basic Materials	2.8%	4.8%
Communication Services	2.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

HUMN vs. KOID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HUMN

HUMN Risk / Return Rank: 26
HUMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
HUMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
HUMN Omega Ratio Rank: 25
HUMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
HUMN Martin Ratio Rank: 27

KOID

KOID Risk / Return Rank: 53
KOID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
KOID Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
KOID Omega Ratio Rank: 52
KOID Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
KOID Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HUMN vs. KOID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and KraneShares Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index ETF (KOID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HUMN	KOID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.57	1.33	-0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.00	1.89	-0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.23	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.74	1.93	-1.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.17	5.58	-3.41

HUMN vs. KOID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUMN Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the KOID Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUMN and KOID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HUMN vs. KOID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUMN drawdown since its inception was -26.44%, which is greater than KOID's maximum drawdown of -19.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUMN and KOID.

Drawdown Indicators

	HUMN	KOID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.44%	-19.63%	-6.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.44%	-19.63%	-6.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.76%	-15.42%	-7.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.99%	-4.16%	-1.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.03%	6.78%	+2.25%

Volatility

HUMN vs. KOID - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) has a higher volatility of 14.11% compared to KraneShares Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index ETF (KOID) at 11.09%. This indicates that HUMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KOID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HUMN	KOID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.11%	11.09%	+3.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.65%	24.03%	+5.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.70%	28.48%	+6.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.57%	27.36%	+6.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.57%	27.36%	+6.21%

HUMN vs. KOID - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUMN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than KOID's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

HUMN vs. KOID - Dividend Comparison

HUMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than KOID's 0.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.72%	0.72%
KOID KraneShares Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index ETF	0.74%	0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HUMN and KOID in my portfolio?

HUMN and KOID have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HUMN or KOID?

HUMN has higher volatility (14.11%) compared to KOID (11.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUMN dropped -26.44% vs KOID's -19.63%.

Which ETF is better, HUMN or KOID?

On 1-year performance, KOID leads with 38.95% vs 20.41% for HUMN. On fees, HUMN is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, KOID has been the lower-risk option at 11.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HUMN or KOID?

Over the 1-year period, KOID has performed better with a 38.95% return vs 20.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HUMN or KOID?

HUMN is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KOID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HUMN or KOID?

KOID has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.72% for HUMN.

What is the main difference between HUMN and KOID?

HUMN is categorized as Robotics, while KOID is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HUMN and 0.79% for KOID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KOID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.