HUMN vs. BOTZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HUMN (Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both Robotics funds. HUMN is actively managed, while BOTZ is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HUMN charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.

Performance

HUMN vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUMN achieves a 29.04% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 11.15% return.

HUMN

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: 15.15%
• YTD: 29.04%
• 6M: 37.39%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BOTZ

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: 4.92%
• YTD: 11.15%
• 6M: 13.89%
• 1Y: 29.53%
• 3Y*: 12.97%
• 5Y*: 3.18%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUMN vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	29.04%	19.36%
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	11.15%	13.00%

Correlation

The correlation between HUMN and BOTZ is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025	0.84

HUMN vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HUMN	BOTZ
Industrials	34.5%	48.6%
Consumer Cyclical	26.4%	6.1%
Technology	23.1%	31.8%
Basic Materials	2.2%	0.0%
Communication Services	2.1%	4.5%
Financial Services	0.1%	0.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Energy	-	0.5%
Healthcare	-	9.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	0.0%

Return for Risk

HUMN vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTZ

BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 31
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUMN vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HUMN	BOTZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.99	0.44	+1.55

Drawdowns

HUMN vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUMN drawdown since its inception was -20.40%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUMN and BOTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	HUMN	BOTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.40%	-55.54%	+35.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-19.34%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.02%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.00%	-3.27%	+2.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.46%	-18.32%	+13.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.63%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HUMN	BOTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.77%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	18.40%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.63%	23.98%	+5.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.63%	26.73%	+2.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.63%	25.73%	+3.90%

HUMN vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUMN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

HUMN vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

HUMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than BOTZ's 0.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	0.59%	0.66%	0.13%	0.20%	0.23%	0.16%	0.19%	0.83%	1.44%	0.01%	0.06%
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.56%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HUMN and BOTZ in my portfolio?

HUMN and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HUMN or BOTZ?

On fees, BOTZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HUMN or BOTZ?

BOTZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HUMN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HUMN or BOTZ?

BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.56% for HUMN.

What is the main difference between HUMN and BOTZ?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HUMN and 0.68% for BOTZ.