HUMN vs. BOTZ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ).

HUMN and BOTZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HUMN is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Jun 25, 2025. BOTZ is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2016.

Performance

HUMN vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HUMN vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	-2.38%	19.36%
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	-6.43%	13.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUMN achieves a -2.38% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's -6.43% return.

HUMN

• 1D: 3.35%
• 1M: -11.69%
• YTD: -2.38%
• 6M: -3.28%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BOTZ

• 1D: 2.05%
• 1M: -11.23%
• YTD: -6.43%
• 6M: -4.66%
• 1Y: 19.21%
• 3Y*: 10.33%
• 5Y*: 0.19%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUMN vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUMN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.

HUMN

Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF

BOTZ

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF

Return for Risk

HUMN vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTZ

BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 38
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 36
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUMN vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HUMN	BOTZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	0.37	+0.45

Correlation

The correlation between HUMN and BOTZ is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

HUMN vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

HUMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than BOTZ's 0.70% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.74%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	0.70%	0.66%	0.13%	0.20%	0.23%	0.16%	0.19%	0.83%	1.44%	0.01%	0.06%

Drawdowns

HUMN vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUMN drawdown since its inception was -20.40%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUMN and BOTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	HUMN	BOTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.40%	-55.54%	+35.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-19.34%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.67%	-14.52%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.39%	-18.56%	+14.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.37%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HUMN	BOTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.79%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	17.74%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.97%	27.79%	-0.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.97%	26.52%	+0.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.97%	25.68%	+1.29%