HUMN vs. DRAM

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

HUMN (Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF) and DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HUMN is a Robotics fund actively managed by Roundhill, while DRAM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HUMN charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DRAM.

Performance

HUMN vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HUMN

• 1D: -3.72%
• 1M: -15.58%
• YTD: 7.60%
• 6M: 9.53%
• 1Y: 28.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DRAM

• 1D: -6.52%
• 1M: 18.36%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUMN vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	10.22%
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	166.22%

Correlation

The correlation between HUMN and DRAM is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026	0.77

HUMN vs. DRAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HUMN	DRAM
Industrials	36.7%	-
Technology	26.2%	100.0%
Consumer Cyclical	18.4%	-
Basic Materials	6.9%	-
Communication Services	2.1%	-
Financial Services	0.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

HUMN vs. DRAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUMN

HUMN Risk / Return Rank: 28
HUMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
HUMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
HUMN Omega Ratio Rank: 26
HUMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
HUMN Martin Ratio Rank: 31

DRAM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUMN vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HUMN	DRAM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.40	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.20	—	—

Drawdowns

HUMN vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUMN drawdown since its inception was -20.40%, roughly equal to the maximum DRAM drawdown of -19.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUMN and DRAM.

Drawdown Indicators

	HUMN	DRAM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.40%	-19.97%	-0.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.45%	-10.95%	-6.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.77%	-3.43%	-1.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.79%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HUMN	DRAM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.01%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.77%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.44%	93.98%	-62.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.44%	93.98%	-62.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.44%	93.98%	-62.54%

HUMN vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUMN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

HUMN vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison

HUMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	0.00%	0.00%
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.67%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HUMN and DRAM in my portfolio?

HUMN and DRAM have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HUMN or DRAM?

On fees, DRAM is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HUMN or DRAM?

DRAM is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HUMN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HUMN or DRAM?

HUMN has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.

What is the main difference between HUMN and DRAM?

HUMN is categorized as Robotics, while DRAM is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HUMN and 0.65% for DRAM.