PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HUBS vs. SFM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HUBS vs. SFM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) and Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUBS achieves a -53.16% return, which is significantly lower than SFM's 8.36% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HUBS having a 14.57% annualized return and SFM not far behind at 14.32%.


HUBS

1D
0.83%
1M
-5.24%
YTD
-53.16%
6M
-50.00%
1Y
-66.10%
3Y*
-28.43%
5Y*
-18.40%
10Y*
14.57%

SFM

1D
-2.03%
1M
0.96%
YTD
8.36%
6M
8.54%
1Y
-45.33%
3Y*
35.31%
5Y*
24.38%
10Y*
14.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUBS vs. SFM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HUBS
HubSpot, Inc.
-53.16%-42.41%20.02%100.79%-56.14%66.27%150.12%26.06%42.23%88.09%
SFM
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
8.36%-37.30%164.12%48.63%9.06%47.66%3.88%-17.69%-3.45%28.70%

Correlation

The correlation between HUBS and SFM is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2014

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HUBS:

$9.88B

SFM:

$8.25B

EPS

HUBS:

$1.91

SFM:

$5.20

PE Ratio

HUBS:

98.67

SFM:

16.62

PEG Ratio

HUBS:

0.11

SFM:

0.60

PS Ratio

HUBS:

3.00

SFM:

0.95

PB Ratio

HUBS:

4.95

SFM:

5.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

HUBS:

$3.30B

SFM:

$8.90B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HUBS:

$2.76B

SFM:

$3.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

HUBS:

$196.96M

SFM:

$837.54M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HUBS vs. SFM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUBS
HUBS Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
HUBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUBS Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
HUBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUBS Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

SFM
SFM Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFM Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
SFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFM Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUBS vs. SFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) and Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HUBSSFMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

0.81

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

-0.73

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.66

-0.99

-0.67

HUBS vs. SFM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUBS Sharpe Ratio is -1.07, which is comparable to the SFM Sharpe Ratio of -0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUBS and SFM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HUBS vs. SFM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUBS drawdown since its inception was -78.99%, which is greater than SFM's maximum drawdown of -72.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUBS and SFM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HUBSSFMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.99%

-72.88%

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.09%

-62.17%

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.16%

-63.48%

-14.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.99%

-63.48%

-15.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.99%

-63.48%

-15.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.94%

-51.91%

-26.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.21%

-40.28%

+17.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.95%

45.41%

-4.46%

Volatility

HUBS vs. SFM - Volatility Comparison

HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) has a higher volatility of 27.45% compared to Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) at 12.50%. This indicates that HUBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HUBSSFMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.45%

12.50%

+14.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.03%

30.32%

+24.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.97%

46.09%

+16.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.02%

39.23%

+15.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.98%

37.82%

+13.16%

Dividends

HUBS vs. SFM - Dividend Comparison

Neither HUBS nor SFM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

HUBS vs. SFM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between HubSpot, Inc. and Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
881.00M
2.33B
(HUBS) Total Revenue
(SFM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HUBS vs. SFM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between HubSpot, Inc. and Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
83.5%
39.4%
Portfolio components
HUBS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported a gross profit of 735.30M and revenue of 881.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.

SFM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. reported a gross profit of 917.28M and revenue of 2.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.

HUBS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported an operating income of 27.94M and revenue of 881.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.

SFM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. reported an operating income of 215.31M and revenue of 2.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.

HUBS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported a net income of 32.55M and revenue of 881.00M, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.

SFM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. reported a net income of 163.72M and revenue of 2.33B, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HUBS and SFM have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HUBS has higher volatility (27.45%) compared to SFM (12.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUBS dropped -78.99% vs SFM's -72.88%.

SFM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.98 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HUBS and SFM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer