PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFM vs. POWL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SFM vs. POWL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) and Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFM achieves a -0.87% return, which is significantly lower than POWL's 182.31% return. Over the past 10 years, SFM has underperformed POWL with an annualized return of 12.45%, while POWL has yielded a comparatively higher 41.47% annualized return.


SFM

1D
1.19%
1M
-2.12%
YTD
-0.87%
6M
-7.19%
1Y
-54.92%
3Y*
33.68%
5Y*
23.42%
10Y*
12.45%

POWL

1D
0.22%
1M
11.07%
YTD
182.31%
6M
178.20%
1Y
419.37%
3Y*
145.78%
5Y*
95.35%
10Y*
41.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFM vs. POWL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SFM
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
-0.87%-37.30%164.12%48.63%9.06%47.66%3.88%-17.69%-3.45%28.70%
POWL
Powell Industries, Inc.
182.31%44.49%152.21%155.62%24.34%3.60%-37.60%101.58%-9.92%-24.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SFM and POWL is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2013

0.17

The correlation between SFM and POWL shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SFM:

$7.55B

POWL:

$10.95B

EPS

SFM:

$5.20

POWL:

$5.12

PE Ratio

SFM:

15.20

POWL:

58.56

PEG Ratio

SFM:

0.55

POWL:

0.09

PS Ratio

SFM:

0.87

POWL:

9.67

PB Ratio

SFM:

5.26

POWL:

15.45

Total Revenue (TTM)

SFM:

$8.90B

POWL:

$1.13B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SFM:

$3.41B

POWL:

$340.78M

EBITDA (TTM)

SFM:

$837.54M

POWL:

$236.11M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFM vs. POWL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFM
SFM Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
SFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFM Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
SFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFM Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

POWL
POWL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
POWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
POWL Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
POWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
POWL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFM vs. POWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) and Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SFMPOWLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-8.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.74

1.67

-0.93

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.89

13.69

-14.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.23

44.07

-45.30

SFM vs. POWL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFM Sharpe Ratio is -1.21, which is lower than the POWL Sharpe Ratio of 7.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFM and POWL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SFMPOWLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.21

7.24

-8.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

1.50

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.76

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.29

-0.14

Drawdowns

SFM vs. POWL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFM drawdown since its inception was -72.88%, roughly equal to the maximum POWL drawdown of -73.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFM and POWL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFMPOWLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.88%

-73.10%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.17%

-30.88%

-31.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.48%

-55.76%

-7.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.48%

-55.76%

-7.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.48%

-68.85%

+5.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.01%

-6.90%

-49.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.26%

-36.12%

-4.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

45.12%

9.57%

+35.55%

Volatility

SFM vs. POWL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) is 13.19%, while Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) has a volatility of 19.61%. This indicates that SFM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFMPOWLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.19%

19.61%

-6.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.78%

42.55%

-12.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.70%

58.36%

-12.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.18%

64.06%

-24.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.77%

54.66%

-16.89%

Dividends

SFM vs. POWL - Dividend Comparison

SFM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while POWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
POWL
Powell Industries, Inc.
0.12%0.34%0.48%1.19%2.96%3.53%3.53%2.12%4.16%3.63%2.67%4.00%
SFM
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SFM vs. POWL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. and Powell Industries, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
2.33B
296.62M
(SFM) Total Revenue
(POWL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SFM vs. POWL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. and Powell Industries, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
39.4%
29.7%
Portfolio components
SFM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. reported a gross profit of 917.28M and revenue of 2.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.

POWL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 87.94M and revenue of 296.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.7%.

SFM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. reported an operating income of 215.31M and revenue of 2.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.

POWL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 57.58M and revenue of 296.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.4%.

SFM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. reported a net income of 163.72M and revenue of 2.33B, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.

POWL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 45.89M and revenue of 296.62M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SFM and POWL have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

POWL has higher volatility (19.61%) compared to SFM (13.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFM dropped -72.88% vs POWL's -73.10%.

POWL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.24 vs -1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFM and POWL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer