HUBS vs. P
HUBS (HubSpot, Inc.) and P (Everpure, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — HUBS in Software - Application, P in Computer Hardware. Over the past 10 years, HUBS returned 14.57%/yr vs 21.03%/yr for P. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HUBS vs. P - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUBS achieves a -53.16% return, which is significantly lower than P's 7.91% return. Over the past 10 years, HUBS has underperformed P with an annualized return of 14.57%, while P has yielded a comparatively higher 21.03% annualized return.
HUBS
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- -53.16%
- 6M
- -50.00%
- 1Y
- -66.10%
- 3Y*
- -28.43%
- 5Y*
- -18.40%
- 10Y*
- 14.57%
P
- 1D
- 4.28%
- 1M
- -10.93%
- YTD
- 7.91%
- 6M
- 1.39%
- 1Y
- 40.00%
- 3Y*
- 25.48%
- 5Y*
- 30.55%
- 10Y*
- 21.03%
HUBS vs. P - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | -53.16% | -42.41% | 20.02% | 100.79% | -56.14% | 66.27% | 150.12% | 26.06% | 42.23% | 88.09% |
P Everpure, Inc. | 7.91% | 9.08% | 72.27% | 33.26% | -17.79% | 43.96% | 32.14% | 6.41% | 1.39% | 40.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUBS and P is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2015 | 0.41 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HUBS and P has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
HUBS:
$9.88B
P:
$23.61B
HUBS:
$1.91
P:
$0.56
HUBS:
98.67
P:
129.77
HUBS:
0.11
P:
4.02
HUBS:
3.00
P:
6.67
HUBS:
$3.30B
P:
$3.66B
HUBS:
$2.76B
P:
$2.58B
HUBS:
$196.96M
P:
$306.67M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUBS vs. P — Risk / Return Rank
HUBS
P
HUBS vs. P - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) and Everpure, Inc. (P). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HUBS | P | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.16 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 0.78 | -1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.66 | 1.50 | -3.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HUBS vs. P - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUBS drawdown since its inception was -78.99%, which is greater than P's maximum drawdown of -69.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUBS and P.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUBS | P | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.99% | -69.43% | -9.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.09% | -42.26% | -25.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.16% | -48.63% | -29.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.99% | -48.63% | -30.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.99% | -69.43% | -9.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.94% | -26.74% | -51.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.21% | -24.44% | +1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.95% | 21.89% | +19.06% |
Volatility
HUBS vs. P - Volatility Comparison
HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) and Everpure, Inc. (P) have volatilities of 27.45% and 26.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUBS | P | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.45% | 26.95% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.03% | 45.02% | +10.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.97% | 68.32% | -5.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.02% | 52.74% | +2.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.98% | 51.15% | -0.17% |
Dividends
HUBS vs. P - Dividend Comparison
Neither HUBS nor P has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
HUBS vs. P - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between HubSpot, Inc. and Everpure, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HUBS vs. P - Profitability Comparison
HUBS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported a gross profit of 735.30M and revenue of 881.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.
P - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Everpure, Inc. reported a gross profit of 536.15M and revenue of 778.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.9%.
HUBS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported an operating income of 27.94M and revenue of 881.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.
P - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Everpure, Inc. reported an operating income of -31.17M and revenue of 778.49M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.0%.
HUBS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported a net income of 32.55M and revenue of 881.00M, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.
P - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Everpure, Inc. reported a net income of -14.00M and revenue of 778.49M, resulting in a net margin of -1.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HUBS and P have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HUBS has higher volatility (27.45%) compared to P (26.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUBS dropped -78.99% vs P's -69.43%.
P currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.48 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HUBS and P
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer