P vs. CRCT
P (Everpure, Inc.) and CRCT (Cricut, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Computer Hardware industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 5 years, P returned 34.04%/yr vs -29.90%/yr for CRCT. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
P vs. CRCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, P achieves a 20.64% return, which is significantly higher than CRCT's -15.26% return.
P
- 1D
- -2.58%
- 1M
- 11.12%
- YTD
- 20.64%
- 6M
- 17.41%
- 1Y
- 47.33%
- 3Y*
- 33.14%
- 5Y*
- 34.04%
- 10Y*
- 21.32%
CRCT
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -1.20%
- YTD
- -15.26%
- 6M
- -16.28%
- 1Y
- -23.67%
- 3Y*
- -17.50%
- 5Y*
- -29.90%
- 10Y*
- —
P vs. CRCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P Everpure, Inc. | 20.64% | 9.08% | 72.27% | 33.26% | -17.79% | 53.90% |
CRCT Cricut, Inc. | -15.26% | 7.53% | -6.79% | -20.13% | -58.04% | 24.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between P and CRCT is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2021 | 0.25 |
Fundamentals
P:
$27.98B
CRCT:
$873.57M
P:
$0.55
CRCT:
$0.34
P:
146.69
CRCT:
12.05
P:
7.54
CRCT:
1.25
P:
19.35
CRCT:
2.44
P:
$3.66B
CRCT:
$705.62M
P:
$2.58B
CRCT:
$384.78M
P:
$373.91M
CRCT:
$108.59M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
P vs. CRCT — Risk / Return Rank
P
CRCT
P vs. CRCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Everpure, Inc. (P) and Cricut, Inc. (CRCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| P | CRCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | -0.57 | +1.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.36 | -0.60 | +1.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 0.93 | +0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | -0.54 | +1.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.22 | -0.87 | +3.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| P | CRCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | -0.57 | +1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | -0.46 | +1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | -0.28 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
P vs. CRCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum P drawdown since its inception was -69.43%, smaller than the maximum CRCT drawdown of -87.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for P and CRCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| P | CRCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.43% | -87.89% | +18.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.26% | -44.20% | +1.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.63% | -70.72% | +22.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.63% | -87.89% | +39.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.10% | -85.24% | +67.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.44% | -70.93% | +46.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.42% | 27.24% | -5.82% |
Volatility
P vs. CRCT - Volatility Comparison
Everpure, Inc. (P) has a higher volatility of 26.95% compared to Cricut, Inc. (CRCT) at 14.86%. This indicates that P's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| P | CRCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.95% | 14.86% | +12.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.58% | 26.78% | +27.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.12% | 41.99% | +25.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.45% | 64.58% | -12.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.04% | 66.11% | -15.07% |
Dividends
P vs. CRCT - Dividend Comparison
P has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CRCT Cricut, Inc. | 23.11% | 27.27% | 7.02% | 20.49% |
P Everpure, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
P vs. CRCT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Everpure, Inc. and Cricut, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
P vs. CRCT - Profitability Comparison
P - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Everpure, Inc. reported a gross profit of 740.09M and revenue of 1.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.9%.
CRCT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cricut, Inc. reported a gross profit of 92.70M and revenue of 159.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.1%.
P - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Everpure, Inc. reported an operating income of 87.20M and revenue of 1.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.2%.
CRCT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cricut, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.89M and revenue of 159.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.
P - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Everpure, Inc. reported a net income of 100.25M and revenue of 1.06B, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.
CRCT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cricut, Inc. reported a net income of 20.32M and revenue of 159.47M, resulting in a net margin of 12.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
P and CRCT have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
P has higher volatility (26.95%) compared to CRCT (14.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, P dropped -69.43% vs CRCT's -87.89%.
P currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for P and CRCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer