PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HUBS vs. FIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HUBS vs. FIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) and Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUBS achieves a -53.16% return, which is significantly lower than FIX's 101.37% return. Over the past 10 years, HUBS has underperformed FIX with an annualized return of 14.57%, while FIX has yielded a comparatively higher 51.27% annualized return.


HUBS

1D
0.83%
1M
-5.24%
YTD
-53.16%
6M
-50.00%
1Y
-66.10%
3Y*
-28.43%
5Y*
-18.40%
10Y*
14.57%

FIX

1D
1.85%
1M
-5.78%
YTD
101.37%
6M
94.15%
1Y
281.93%
3Y*
128.82%
5Y*
86.97%
10Y*
51.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUBS vs. FIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HUBS
HubSpot, Inc.
-53.16%-42.41%20.02%100.79%-56.14%66.27%150.12%26.06%42.23%88.09%
FIX
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
101.37%120.86%106.89%79.62%16.98%88.98%6.73%15.07%0.73%32.13%

Correlation

The correlation between HUBS and FIX is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2014

0.25

The correlation between HUBS and FIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HUBS:

$9.88B

FIX:

$66.19B

EPS

HUBS:

$1.91

FIX:

$34.64

PE Ratio

HUBS:

98.67

FIX:

54.21

PEG Ratio

HUBS:

0.11

FIX:

0.82

PS Ratio

HUBS:

3.00

FIX:

6.54

PB Ratio

HUBS:

4.95

FIX:

23.51

Total Revenue (TTM)

HUBS:

$3.30B

FIX:

$10.14B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HUBS:

$2.76B

FIX:

$2.55B

EBITDA (TTM)

HUBS:

$196.96M

FIX:

$1.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HUBS vs. FIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUBS
HUBS Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
HUBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUBS Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
HUBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUBS Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

FIX
FIX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUBS vs. FIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) and Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HUBSFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

1.66

-0.89

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

17.58

-18.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.66

59.47

-61.14

HUBS vs. FIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUBS Sharpe Ratio is -1.07, which is lower than the FIX Sharpe Ratio of 5.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUBS and FIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HUBS vs. FIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUBS drawdown since its inception was -78.99%, smaller than the maximum FIX drawdown of -93.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUBS and FIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HUBSFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.99%

-93.36%

+14.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.09%

-15.78%

-52.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.16%

-46.05%

-32.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.99%

-46.05%

-32.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.99%

-49.68%

-29.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.94%

-8.03%

-69.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.21%

-38.06%

+14.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.95%

4.66%

+36.29%

Volatility

HUBS vs. FIX - Volatility Comparison

HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) has a higher volatility of 27.45% compared to Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) at 15.34%. This indicates that HUBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HUBSFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.45%

15.34%

+12.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.03%

38.30%

+16.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.97%

54.05%

+8.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.02%

44.66%

+10.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.98%

42.44%

+8.54%

Dividends

HUBS vs. FIX - Dividend Comparison

HUBS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIX
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
0.14%0.21%0.28%0.41%0.49%0.49%0.81%0.79%0.76%0.68%0.83%0.88%
HUBS
HubSpot, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

HUBS vs. FIX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between HubSpot, Inc. and Comfort Systems USA, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
881.00M
2.87B
(HUBS) Total Revenue
(FIX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HUBS vs. FIX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between HubSpot, Inc. and Comfort Systems USA, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
83.5%
26.3%
Portfolio components
HUBS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported a gross profit of 735.30M and revenue of 881.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.

FIX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported a gross profit of 754.41M and revenue of 2.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.3%.

HUBS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported an operating income of 27.94M and revenue of 881.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.

FIX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported an operating income of 485.72M and revenue of 2.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.0%.

HUBS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported a net income of 32.55M and revenue of 881.00M, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.

FIX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported a net income of 370.38M and revenue of 2.87B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HUBS and FIX have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HUBS has higher volatility (27.45%) compared to FIX (15.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUBS dropped -78.99% vs FIX's -93.36%.

FIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.13 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HUBS and FIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer