PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
FIX vs. CLS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

FIX vs. CLS

Last updated May 15, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) and Celestica Inc. (CLS).

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FIX or CLS.

Correlation

The correlation between FIX and CLS is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

FIX vs. CLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FIX:

0.69

CLS:

1.81

Sortino Ratio

FIX:

1.10

CLS:

2.16

Omega Ratio

FIX:

1.17

CLS:

1.31

Calmar Ratio

FIX:

0.78

CLS:

2.48

Martin Ratio

FIX:

1.91

CLS:

6.21

Ulcer Index

FIX:

18.84%

CLS:

21.57%

Daily Std Dev

FIX:

58.69%

CLS:

76.07%

Max Drawdown

FIX:

-93.36%

CLS:

-96.93%

Current Drawdown

FIX:

-14.93%

CLS:

-21.03%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FIX:

$16.41B

CLS:

$12.63B

EPS

FIX:

$17.17

CLS:

$3.92

PE Ratio

FIX:

27.10

CLS:

28.03

PEG Ratio

FIX:

2.06

CLS:

19.42

PS Ratio

FIX:

2.24

CLS:

1.25

PB Ratio

FIX:

8.97

CLS:

7.41

Total Revenue (TTM)

FIX:

$7.32B

CLS:

$10.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FIX:

$1.57B

CLS:

$1.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

FIX:

$913.69M

CLS:

$724.86M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIX achieves a 10.38% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's 22.91% return. Over the past 10 years, FIX has outperformed CLS with an annualized return of 36.53%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively lower 24.65% annualized return.

FIX

YTD

10.38%

1M

32.97%

6M

4.97%

1Y

40.26%

5Y*

73.76%

10Y*

36.53%

CLS

YTD

22.91%

1M

40.27%

6M

38.27%

1Y

136.35%

5Y*

84.03%

10Y*

24.65%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FIX vs. CLS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FIX is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FIX is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FIX is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FIX is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FIX is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FIX is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
CLS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLS is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLS is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLS is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLS is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLS is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLS is 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FIX vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the CLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIX and CLS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading data...

Dividends

FIX vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison

FIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FIX
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.		0.22%0.28%0.41%0.49%0.49%0.81%0.79%0.76%0.68%0.83%0.88%1.31%
CLS
Celestica Inc.		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FIX vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIX drawdown since its inception was -93.36%, roughly equal to the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIX and CLS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Loading data...

Volatility

FIX vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) is 13.09%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 17.75%. This indicates that FIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading data...

Financials

FIX vs. CLS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Comfort Systems USA, Inc. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20212022202320242025
1.83B
2.65B
(FIX) Total Revenue
(CLS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FIX vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Comfort Systems USA, Inc. and Celestica Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual
10.0%15.0%20.0%20212022202320242025
22.0%
10.3%
(FIX) Gross Margin
(CLS) Gross Margin
FIX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported a gross profit of 403.42M and revenue of 1.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.0%.

CLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 273.90M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.3%.

FIX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported an operating income of 209.10M and revenue of 1.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.4%.

CLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 128.80M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

FIX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported a net income of 169.29M and revenue of 1.83B, resulting in a net margin of 9.2%.

CLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 86.20M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.