FIX vs. CLS

In the year-to-date period, FIX achieves a -6.16% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's -3.52% return. Over the past 10 years, FIX has outperformed CLS with an annualized return of 35.51%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively lower 22.08% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the CLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIX and CLS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum FIX drawdown since its inception was -93.36%, roughly equal to the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIX and CLS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) is 23.51%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 31.13%. This indicates that FIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Comfort Systems USA, Inc. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.