HUBS vs. DT
HUBS (HubSpot, Inc.) and DT (Dynatrace, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Software - Application industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 5 years, HUBS returned -18.40%/yr vs -5.97%/yr for DT. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
HUBS vs. DT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUBS achieves a -53.16% return, which is significantly lower than DT's -5.98% return.
HUBS
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- -53.16%
- 6M
- -50.00%
- 1Y
- -66.10%
- 3Y*
- -28.43%
- 5Y*
- -18.40%
- 10Y*
- 14.57%
DT
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 6.23%
- YTD
- -5.98%
- 6M
- -11.49%
- 1Y
- -23.16%
- 3Y*
- -7.55%
- 5Y*
- -5.97%
- 10Y*
- —
HUBS vs. DT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | -53.16% | -42.41% | 20.02% | 100.79% | -56.14% | 66.27% | 150.12% | -11.31% |
DT Dynatrace, Inc. | -5.98% | -20.26% | -0.62% | 42.79% | -36.54% | 39.47% | 71.03% | -0.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUBS and DT is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019 | 0.62 |
The correlation between HUBS and DT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
HUBS:
$9.88B
DT:
$12.18B
HUBS:
$1.91
DT:
$0.73
HUBS:
98.67
DT:
55.69
HUBS:
0.11
DT:
0.77
HUBS:
3.00
DT:
6.11
HUBS:
4.95
DT:
4.66
HUBS:
$3.30B
DT:
$2.02B
HUBS:
$2.76B
DT:
$1.65B
HUBS:
$196.96M
DT:
$289.14M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUBS vs. DT — Risk / Return Rank
HUBS
DT
HUBS vs. DT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) and Dynatrace, Inc. (DT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HUBS | DT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 0.91 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | -0.58 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.66 | -1.01 | -0.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HUBS vs. DT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUBS drawdown since its inception was -78.99%, which is greater than DT's maximum drawdown of -61.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUBS and DT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUBS | DT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.99% | -61.77% | -17.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.09% | -42.87% | -25.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.16% | -48.16% | -30.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.99% | -61.77% | -17.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.94% | -48.26% | -29.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.21% | -30.74% | +7.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.95% | 24.41% | +16.54% |
Volatility
HUBS vs. DT - Volatility Comparison
HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) has a higher volatility of 27.45% compared to Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) at 14.37%. This indicates that HUBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUBS | DT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.45% | 14.37% | +13.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.03% | 33.53% | +21.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.97% | 39.53% | +23.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.02% | 40.76% | +14.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.98% | 46.56% | +4.42% |
Dividends
HUBS vs. DT - Dividend Comparison
Neither HUBS nor DT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
HUBS vs. DT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between HubSpot, Inc. and Dynatrace, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HUBS vs. DT - Profitability Comparison
HUBS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported a gross profit of 735.30M and revenue of 881.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.
DT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dynatrace, Inc. reported a gross profit of 430.32M and revenue of 531.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.9%.
HUBS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported an operating income of 27.94M and revenue of 881.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.
DT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dynatrace, Inc. reported an operating income of 37.34M and revenue of 531.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.
HUBS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported a net income of 32.55M and revenue of 881.00M, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.
DT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dynatrace, Inc. reported a net income of 76.21M and revenue of 531.72M, resulting in a net margin of 14.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HUBS and DT have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HUBS has higher volatility (27.45%) compared to DT (14.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUBS dropped -78.99% vs DT's -61.77%.
DT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.62 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HUBS and DT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer