DT vs. PATH

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

DT (Dynatrace, Inc.) and PATH (UiPath Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — DT in Software - Application, PATH in Software - Infrastructure. Over the past 5 years, DT returned -2.06%/yr vs -30.20%/yr for PATH. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

DT vs. PATH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) and UiPath Inc. (PATH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DT achieves a 3.76% return, which is significantly higher than PATH's -25.69% return.

DT

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 19.57%
• YTD: 3.76%
• 6M: 0.16%
• 1Y: -16.43%
• 3Y*: -5.10%
• 5Y*: -2.06%
• 10Y*: —

PATH

• 1D: -7.02%
• 1M: 14.15%
• YTD: -25.69%
• 6M: -14.83%
• 1Y: -2.48%
• 3Y*: -12.59%
• 5Y*: -30.20%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DT vs. PATH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DT Dynatrace, Inc.	3.76%	-20.26%	-0.62%	42.79%	-36.54%	18.80%
PATH UiPath Inc.	-25.69%	28.95%	-48.83%	95.44%	-70.53%	-37.49%

Correlation

The correlation between DT and PATH is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2021	0.59

The correlation between DT and PATH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap DT : $13.44B PATH : $6.43B
EPS DT : $0.73 PATH : $0.61
PE Ratio DT : 61.46 PATH : 20.09
PS Ratio DT : 6.74 PATH : 3.93
PB Ratio DT : 5.15 PATH : 3.38
Total Revenue (TTM) DT : $2.02B PATH : $1.67B
Gross Profit (TTM) DT : $1.65B PATH : $1.39B
EBITDA (TTM) DT : $289.14M PATH : $115.98M

Return for Risk

DT vs. PATH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DT

DT Risk / Return Rank: 24
DT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
DT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
DT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
DT Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
DT Martin Ratio Rank: 27

PATH

PATH Risk / Return Rank: 37
PATH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
PATH Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
PATH Omega Ratio Rank: 38
PATH Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
PATH Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DT vs. PATH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) and UiPath Inc. (PATH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DT	PATH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.42	-0.04	-0.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.35	0.43	-0.78
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.05	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.39	-0.17	-0.23
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.70	-0.31	-0.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DT vs. PATH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DT Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is lower than the PATH Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DT and PATH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DT	PATH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.42	-0.04	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.05	-0.48	+0.43
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	-0.45	+0.66

Drawdowns

DT vs. PATH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DT drawdown since its inception was -61.77%, smaller than the maximum PATH drawdown of -88.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DT and PATH.

Drawdown Indicators

	DT	PATH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.77%	-88.98%	+27.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.87%	-51.37%	+8.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.16%	-65.10%	+16.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.77%	-87.66%	+25.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.90%	-85.69%	+42.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.68%	-73.71%	+43.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.95%	27.70%	-3.75%

Volatility

DT vs. PATH - Volatility Comparison

Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) and UiPath Inc. (PATH) have volatilities of 19.49% and 19.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DT	PATH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.49%	19.33%	+0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.17%	48.35%	-15.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.27%	63.75%	-24.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.83%	63.77%	-22.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.57%	64.29%	-17.72%

Dividends

DT vs. PATH - Dividend Comparison

Neither DT nor PATH has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

DT vs. PATH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Dynatrace, Inc. and UiPath Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

DT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dynatrace, Inc. reported a gross profit of 430.32M and revenue of 531.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.9%.

PATH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UiPath Inc. reported a gross profit of 341.45M and revenue of 418.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.6%.

DT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dynatrace, Inc. reported an operating income of 37.34M and revenue of 531.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.

PATH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UiPath Inc. reported an operating income of 27.99M and revenue of 418.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.

DT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dynatrace, Inc. reported a net income of 76.21M and revenue of 531.72M, resulting in a net margin of 14.3%.

PATH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UiPath Inc. reported a net income of 22.53M and revenue of 418.38M, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DT and PATH in my portfolio?

DT and PATH have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DT or PATH?

DT has higher volatility (19.49%) compared to PATH (19.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DT dropped -61.77% vs PATH's -88.98%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PATH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.04 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.