PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HQGO vs. MEME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HQGO vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HQGO achieves a 10.30% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 82.10% return.


HQGO

1D
0.12%
1M
4.99%
YTD
10.30%
6M
9.57%
1Y
25.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MEME

1D
1.71%
1M
21.14%
YTD
82.10%
6M
57.24%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HQGO vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HQGO
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
10.30%0.95%
MEME
Roundhill Meme Stock ETF
82.10%-36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between HQGO and MEME is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025

0.55

HQGO vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HQGO
MEME

Technology

39.1%
58.8%

Consumer Cyclical

14.1%

-

Communication Services

13.4%
5.5%

Healthcare

9.0%
5.4%

Industrials

6.7%
29.9%

Financial Services

6.6%
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%

-

Energy

4.2%
4.8%

Basic Materials

1.9%
4.6%

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Utilities

0.1%
10.7%

Technology

HQGO
39.1%
MEME
58.8%

Consumer Cyclical

HQGO
14.1%
MEME

-

Communication Services

HQGO
13.4%
MEME
5.5%

Healthcare

HQGO
9.0%
MEME
5.4%

Industrials

HQGO
6.7%
MEME
29.9%

Financial Services

HQGO
6.6%
MEME
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

HQGO
4.4%
MEME

-

Energy

HQGO
4.2%
MEME
4.8%

Basic Materials

HQGO
1.9%
MEME
4.6%

Real Estate

HQGO
0.6%
MEME

-

Utilities

HQGO
0.1%
MEME
10.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HQGO vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HQGO
HQGO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
HQGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HQGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
HQGO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
HQGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
HQGO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

MEME
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HQGO vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HQGOMEMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.30

HQGO vs. MEME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HQGOMEMEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.38

0.33

+1.06

Drawdowns

HQGO vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HQGO drawdown since its inception was -20.85%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HQGO and MEME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HQGOMEMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.85%

-48.78%

+27.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-4.32%

+3.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.52%

-29.74%

+27.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

Volatility

HQGO vs. MEME - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HQGOMEMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.35%

73.99%

-60.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.97%

73.99%

-57.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

73.99%

-57.02%

HQGO vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

HQGO has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

HQGO vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

HQGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, while MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
HQGO
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
0.46%0.51%0.52%
MEME
Roundhill Meme Stock ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HQGO and MEME have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HQGO is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HQGO is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.

HQGO has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.

They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for HQGO and 0.69% for MEME.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HQGO and MEME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer