HQGO vs. ACSI
Compare and contrast key facts about Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) and American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI).
HQGO and ACSI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HQGO is a passively managed fund by Hartford that tracks the performance of the Hartford US Quality Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Dec 5, 2023. ACSI is a passively managed fund by Exponential ETFs that tracks the performance of the American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2016. Both HQGO and ACSI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
HQGO vs. ACSI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HQGO vs. ACSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HQGO Hartford US Quality Growth ETF | -4.85% | 15.15% | 25.09% | 6.12% |
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF | -3.00% | 10.70% | 22.51% | 4.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HQGO achieves a -4.85% return, which is significantly lower than ACSI's -3.00% return.
HQGO
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -3.93%
- YTD
- -4.85%
- 6M
- -3.46%
- 1Y
- 16.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACSI
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- -3.00%
- 6M
- -1.41%
- 1Y
- 9.41%
- 3Y*
- 14.35%
- 5Y*
- 7.59%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HQGO vs. ACSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
HQGO has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than ACSI's 0.66% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HQGO vs. ACSI — Risk / Return Rank
HQGO
ACSI
HQGO vs. ACSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) and American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HQGO | ACSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 0.60 | +0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 0.97 | +0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.13 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 0.99 | +0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.95 | 3.99 | +1.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HQGO | ACSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 0.60 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | 0.68 | +0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between HQGO and ACSI is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HQGO vs. ACSI - Dividend Comparison
HQGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than ACSI's 0.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HQGO Hartford US Quality Growth ETF | 0.53% | 0.51% | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF | 0.94% | 0.91% | 0.69% | 1.01% | 0.81% | 0.31% | 0.82% | 1.64% | 1.59% | 1.20% | 0.18% |
Drawdowns
HQGO vs. ACSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HQGO drawdown since its inception was -20.85%, smaller than the maximum ACSI drawdown of -34.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HQGO and ACSI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HQGO | ACSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.85% | -34.49% | +13.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.12% | -9.91% | -2.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.95% | -5.38% | -1.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.63% | -5.47% | +2.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 2.46% | +0.49% |
Volatility
HQGO vs. ACSI - Volatility Comparison
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) has a higher volatility of 5.76% compared to American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) at 4.75%. This indicates that HQGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HQGO | ACSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.76% | 4.75% | +1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.84% | 8.55% | +2.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.92% | 15.66% | +4.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 16.65% | +0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 17.49% | -0.19% |