HQGO vs. QGRO
HQGO (Hartford US Quality Growth ETF) and QGRO (American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - HQGO tracks the Hartford US Quality Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross while QGRO tracks the iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Growth (USD)(GR). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, HQGO returned 25.94% vs 10.81% for QGRO. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HQGO charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for QGRO.
Performance
HQGO vs. QGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HQGO achieves a 10.17% return, which is significantly higher than QGRO's 2.19% return.
HQGO
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 5.79%
- YTD
- 10.17%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 25.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QGRO
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- 2.19%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 10.81%
- 3Y*
- 21.29%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- —
HQGO vs. QGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HQGO Hartford US Quality Growth ETF | 10.17% | 15.15% | 25.09% | 6.12% |
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 2.19% | 15.18% | 31.42% | 5.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between HQGO and QGRO is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between HQGO and QGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
HQGO vs. QGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HQGO
QGRO
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
HQGO
QGRO
Consumer Cyclical
HQGO
QGRO
Communication Services
HQGO
QGRO
Healthcare
HQGO
QGRO
Industrials
HQGO
QGRO
Financial Services
HQGO
QGRO
Consumer Defensive
HQGO
QGRO
Energy
HQGO
QGRO
Basic Materials
HQGO
QGRO
Real Estate
HQGO
QGRO
Utilities
HQGO
QGRO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HQGO vs. QGRO — Risk / Return Rank
HQGO
QGRO
HQGO vs. QGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) and American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HQGO | QGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.95 | 0.71 | +1.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.69 | 1.08 | +1.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.13 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 0.80 | +1.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.34 | 2.69 | +7.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HQGO | QGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 0.71 | +1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.38 | 0.67 | +0.72 |
Drawdowns
HQGO vs. QGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HQGO drawdown since its inception was -20.85%, smaller than the maximum QGRO drawdown of -32.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HQGO and QGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HQGO | QGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.85% | -32.56% | +11.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | -13.54% | +3.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -0.67% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.52% | -7.68% | +5.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 4.03% | -1.52% |
Volatility
HQGO vs. QGRO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) is 2.66%, while American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that HQGO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HQGO | QGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.66% | 3.38% | -0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | 11.71% | -1.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.37% | 15.33% | -1.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 21.06% | -4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 22.93% | -5.94% |
HQGO vs. QGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HQGO has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRO's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
HQGO vs. QGRO - Dividend Comparison
HQGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, more than QGRO's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HQGO Hartford US Quality Growth ETF | 0.46% | 0.51% | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.31% | 0.22% | 0.38% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, HQGO and QGRO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QGRO has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to HQGO (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HQGO dropped -20.85% vs QGRO's -32.56%.
On 1-year performance, HQGO leads with 25.94% vs 10.81% for QGRO. On fees, QGRO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, HQGO has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HQGO has performed better with a 25.94% return vs 10.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QGRO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for HQGO.
HQGO has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.19% for QGRO.
HQGO tracks Hartford US Quality Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while QGRO tracks iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Growth (USD)(GR). They also come from different issuers: Hartford and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for HQGO and 0.29% for QGRO.
HQGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HQGO and QGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer