HOC.L vs. GGP.L
HOC.L (Hochschild Mining plc) and GGP.L (Greatland Gold plc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Gold industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, HOC.L returned 17.08%/yr vs 60.56%/yr for GGP.L. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HOC.L vs. GGP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOC.L achieves a 13.22% return, which is significantly lower than GGP.L's 37.64% return. Over the past 10 years, HOC.L has underperformed GGP.L with an annualized return of 17.08%, while GGP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 60.56% annualized return.
HOC.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -8.45%
- YTD
- 13.22%
- 6M
- 38.16%
- 1Y
- 87.00%
- 3Y*
- 93.00%
- 5Y*
- 27.99%
- 10Y*
- 17.08%
GGP.L
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -6.64%
- YTD
- 37.64%
- 6M
- 75.00%
- 1Y
- 147.41%
- 3Y*
- 67.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 60.56%
HOC.L vs. GGP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOC.L Hochschild Mining plc | 13.22% | 141.69% | 99.81% | 52.46% | -43.65% | -29.18% | 17.23% | 19.41% | -39.88% | 25.89% |
GGP.L Greatland Gold plc | 37.64% | 309.83% | -35.50% | 23.25% | -50.00% | -56.64% | 1,950.00% | -0.55% | -2.95% | 997.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOC.L and GGP.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2006 | 0.09 |
Over the past year, HOC.L and GGP.L have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
HOC.L:
£2.97B
GGP.L:
£4.91B
HOC.L:
£0.59
GGP.L:
£0.48
HOC.L:
9.84
GGP.L:
15.01
HOC.L:
1.41
GGP.L:
5.12
HOC.L:
4.12
GGP.L:
5.82
HOC.L:
£2.09B
GGP.L:
£937.29M
HOC.L:
£781.85M
GGP.L:
£483.25M
HOC.L:
£851.03M
GGP.L:
£477.73M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOC.L vs. GGP.L — Risk / Return Rank
HOC.L
GGP.L
HOC.L vs. GGP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hochschild Mining plc (HOC.L) and Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HOC.L | GGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.35 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 4.13 | -0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.81 | 10.73 | -3.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOC.L | GGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 2.25 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.19 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.67 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.15 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
HOC.L vs. GGP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOC.L drawdown since its inception was -93.27%, smaller than the maximum GGP.L drawdown of -98.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOC.L and GGP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOC.L | GGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.27% | -98.48% | +5.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.71% | -35.27% | +2.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.71% | -55.65% | +22.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.40% | -76.82% | +8.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.57% | -86.35% | +5.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.09% | -9.69% | -18.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.74% | -65.13% | +10.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.81% | 13.57% | +1.24% |
Volatility
HOC.L vs. GGP.L - Volatility Comparison
Hochschild Mining plc (HOC.L) has a higher volatility of 17.02% compared to Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) at 13.35%. This indicates that HOC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOC.L | GGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.02% | 13.35% | +3.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.41% | 41.61% | +0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.79% | 64.83% | -3.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.35% | 64.86% | -9.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.15% | 90.93% | -35.78% |
Dividends
HOC.L vs. GGP.L - Dividend Comparison
HOC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, while GGP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGP.L Greatland Gold plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HOC.L Hochschild Mining plc | 0.77% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.05% | 2.38% | 2.84% | 1.92% | 2.11% | 0.90% | 0.55% |
Financials
HOC.L vs. GGP.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hochschild Mining plc and Greatland Gold plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HOC.L vs. GGP.L - Profitability Comparison
HOC.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hochschild Mining plc reported a gross profit of 248.80M and revenue of 617.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.
GGP.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Greatland Gold plc reported a gross profit of 245.52M and revenue of 478.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.3%.
HOC.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hochschild Mining plc reported an operating income of 198.11M and revenue of 617.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 32.1%.
GGP.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Greatland Gold plc reported an operating income of 236.40M and revenue of 478.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.4%.
HOC.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hochschild Mining plc reported a net income of 111.54M and revenue of 617.49M, resulting in a net margin of 18.1%.
GGP.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Greatland Gold plc reported a net income of 167.80M and revenue of 478.24M, resulting in a net margin of 35.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HOC.L and GGP.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for HOC.L and GGP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer