HOC.L vs. SSLN.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Hochschild Mining plc (HOC.L) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L).
SSLN.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Silver. It was launched on Apr 8, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HOC.L or SSLN.L.
Key characteristics
| HOC.L | SSLN.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 118.49% | 29.38% |
| 1Y Return | 126.31% | 31.80% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 17.52% | 10.54% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 6.47% | 12.55% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 12.11% | 9.12% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.77 | 1.08 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.30 | 1.63 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.51 | 0.69 |
| Martin Ratio | 13.52 | 3.78 |
| Ulcer Index | 9.24% | 7.98% |
| Daily Std Dev | 45.08% | 27.92% |
| Max Drawdown | -93.29% | -69.95% |
| Current Drawdown | -53.22% | -22.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOC.L and SSLN.L is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
HOC.L vs. SSLN.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, HOC.L achieves a 118.49% return, which is significantly higher than SSLN.L's 29.38% return. Over the past 10 years, HOC.L has outperformed SSLN.L with an annualized return of 12.11%, while SSLN.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.12% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HOC.L vs. SSLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hochschild Mining plc (HOC.L) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HOC.L vs. SSLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither HOC.L nor SSLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOC.L Hochschild Mining plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.05% | 3.30% | 3.05% | 2.16% | 2.52% | 0.90% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.37% |
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HOC.L vs. SSLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOC.L drawdown since its inception was -93.29%, which is greater than SSLN.L's maximum drawdown of -69.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOC.L and SSLN.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HOC.L vs. SSLN.L - Volatility Comparison
Hochschild Mining plc (HOC.L) has a higher volatility of 14.34% compared to iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) at 9.72%. This indicates that HOC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.