PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
HOC.L vs. FRES.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


HOC.LFRES.L
YTD Return100.28%6.80%
1Y Return109.47%22.60%
3Y Return (Ann)9.71%-11.60%
5Y Return (Ann)5.04%2.21%
10Y Return (Ann)11.78%0.80%
Sharpe Ratio2.300.48
Sortino Ratio2.920.95
Omega Ratio1.351.11
Calmar Ratio1.260.25
Martin Ratio11.241.53
Ulcer Index9.29%12.17%
Daily Std Dev45.30%39.12%
Max Drawdown-93.29%-82.36%
Current Drawdown-57.12%-61.47%

Fundamentals


HOC.LFRES.L
Market Cap£1.14B£4.75B
EPS£0.05£0.25
PE Ratio42.9024.92
PEG Ratio0.000.00
Total Revenue (TTM)£771.43M£2.85B
Gross Profit (TTM)£265.47M£609.46M
EBITDA (TTM)£304.63M£954.39M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between HOC.L and FRES.L is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

HOC.L vs. FRES.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, HOC.L achieves a 100.28% return, which is significantly higher than FRES.L's 6.80% return. Over the past 10 years, HOC.L has outperformed FRES.L with an annualized return of 11.78%, while FRES.L has yielded a comparatively lower 0.80% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
37.44%
10.90%
HOC.L
FRES.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HOC.L vs. FRES.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hochschild Mining plc (HOC.L) and Fresnillo plc (FRES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HOC.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HOC.L, currently valued at 2.30, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.30
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HOC.L, currently valued at 2.86, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.86
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HOC.L, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.35
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HOC.L, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.25
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HOC.L, currently valued at 11.51, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0011.51
FRES.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FRES.L, currently valued at 0.51, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.51
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FRES.L, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.99
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FRES.L, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.12
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FRES.L, currently valued at 0.27, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.27
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FRES.L, currently valued at 1.71, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.71

HOC.L vs. FRES.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the FRES.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOC.L and FRES.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.30
0.51
HOC.L
FRES.L

Dividends

HOC.L vs. FRES.L - Dividend Comparison

HOC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FRES.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
HOC.L
Hochschild Mining plc
0.00%0.00%6.05%3.30%3.05%2.16%2.52%0.90%0.50%0.00%0.00%1.37%
FRES.L
Fresnillo plc
1.70%2.47%3.04%3.74%1.26%3.01%4.71%2.28%0.74%0.61%0.91%6.04%

Drawdowns

HOC.L vs. FRES.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOC.L drawdown since its inception was -93.29%, which is greater than FRES.L's maximum drawdown of -82.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOC.L and FRES.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-75.00%-70.00%-65.00%-60.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-66.26%
-68.35%
HOC.L
FRES.L

Volatility

HOC.L vs. FRES.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hochschild Mining plc (HOC.L) is 14.10%, while Fresnillo plc (FRES.L) has a volatility of 15.70%. This indicates that HOC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.10%
15.70%
HOC.L
FRES.L

Financials

HOC.L vs. FRES.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hochschild Mining plc and Fresnillo plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in GBp except per share items