PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOC.L vs. RGLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HOC.L vs. RGLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Hochschild Mining plc (HOC.L) and Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HOC.L is traded in GBp, while RGLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RGLD values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOC.L achieves a 13.22% return, which is significantly higher than RGLD's -6.00% return. Over the past 10 years, HOC.L has outperformed RGLD with an annualized return of 17.08%, while RGLD has yielded a comparatively lower 14.92% annualized return.


HOC.L

1D
0.09%
1M
-8.45%
YTD
13.22%
6M
38.16%
1Y
87.00%
3Y*
93.00%
5Y*
27.99%
10Y*
17.08%

RGLD

1D
-5.82%
1M
-11.36%
YTD
-6.00%
6M
2.52%
1Y
15.04%
3Y*
17.45%
5Y*
13.69%
10Y*
14.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOC.L vs. RGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HOC.L
Hochschild Mining plc
13.22%141.69%99.81%52.46%-43.65%-29.18%17.23%19.41%-39.88%25.89%
RGLD
Royal Gold, Inc.
-6.00%58.29%12.31%3.26%21.41%0.99%-14.71%38.78%11.79%19.97%

Correlation

The correlation between HOC.L and RGLD is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2007

0.26

Over the past year, HOC.L and RGLD have become more correlated (0.52) than their long-term average of 0.26, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HOC.L:

£2.97B

RGLD:

$17.52B

EPS

HOC.L:

£0.59

RGLD:

$8.53

PE Ratio

HOC.L:

9.84

RGLD:

24.17

PEG Ratio

HOC.L:

0.01

RGLD:

1.64

PS Ratio

HOC.L:

1.41

RGLD:

11.73

PB Ratio

HOC.L:

4.12

RGLD:

2.36

Total Revenue (TTM)

HOC.L:

£2.09B

RGLD:

$1.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HOC.L:

£781.85M

RGLD:

$579.68M

EBITDA (TTM)

HOC.L:

£851.03M

RGLD:

$949.59M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOC.L vs. RGLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOC.L
HOC.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
HOC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
HOC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

RGLD
RGLD Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
RGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
RGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOC.L vs. RGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hochschild Mining plc (HOC.L) and Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HOC.LRGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.10

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

0.47

+2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.81

1.23

+5.59

HOC.L vs. RGLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is higher than the RGLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOC.L and RGLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HOC.LRGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

0.40

+1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.47

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.46

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.41

-0.32

Drawdowns

HOC.L vs. RGLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOC.L drawdown since its inception was -93.27%, which is greater than RGLD's maximum drawdown of -69.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOC.L and RGLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOC.LRGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.27%

-69.57%

-23.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.71%

-31.82%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.71%

-31.82%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.40%

-31.82%

-36.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.57%

-48.18%

-32.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.09%

-31.82%

+3.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.74%

-18.03%

-36.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.81%

12.31%

+2.50%

Volatility

HOC.L vs. RGLD - Volatility Comparison

Hochschild Mining plc (HOC.L) has a higher volatility of 17.02% compared to Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) at 10.98%. This indicates that HOC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOC.LRGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.02%

10.98%

+6.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.41%

30.55%

+11.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.79%

37.61%

+24.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.35%

29.39%

+25.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.15%

32.50%

+22.65%

Dividends

HOC.L vs. RGLD - Dividend Comparison

HOC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than RGLD's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HOC.L
Hochschild Mining plc
0.77%0.43%0.00%0.00%5.05%2.38%2.84%1.92%2.11%0.90%0.55%0.00%
RGLD
Royal Gold, Inc.
0.90%0.81%1.21%1.24%1.24%1.14%1.05%0.87%1.17%1.17%1.45%1.81%

Financials

HOC.L vs. RGLD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hochschild Mining plc and Royal Gold, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M202120222023202420252026
617.49M
469.13M
(HOC.L) Total Revenue
(RGLD) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. HOC.L values in GBp, RGLD values in USD

HOC.L vs. RGLD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hochschild Mining plc and Royal Gold, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202120222023202420252026
40.3%
0
Portfolio components
HOC.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hochschild Mining plc reported a gross profit of 248.80M and revenue of 617.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.

RGLD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Gold, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 469.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

HOC.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hochschild Mining plc reported an operating income of 198.11M and revenue of 617.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 32.1%.

RGLD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Gold, Inc. reported an operating income of 297.09M and revenue of 469.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 63.3%.

HOC.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hochschild Mining plc reported a net income of 111.54M and revenue of 617.49M, resulting in a net margin of 18.1%.

RGLD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Gold, Inc. reported a net income of 281.13M and revenue of 469.13M, resulting in a net margin of 59.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HOC.L and RGLD have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOC.L and RGLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer