HL vs. FLKR
HL (Hecla Mining Company) is a stock, while FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) is South Korea Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Over the past 5 years, HL returned 16.67%/yr vs 14.07%/yr for FLKR. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
HL vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HL achieves a -26.39% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 61.37% return.
HL
- 1D
- -5.43%
- 1M
- -9.43%
- 6M
- -37.28%
- YTD
- -26.39%
- 1Y
- 146.28%
- 3Y*
- 37.43%
- 5Y*
- 16.67%
- 10Y*
- 8.43%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.08%
FLKR
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- -15.74%
- 6M
- 29.07%
- YTD
- 61.37%
- 1Y
- 117.49%
- 3Y*
- 35.68%
- 5Y*
- 14.07%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.21%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $43.49M | $47.84M | $51.57M | |
| $675.62M | $596.53M | $453.27M |
HL vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HL Hecla Mining Company | -26.39% | 291.70% | 2.82% | -12.93% | 6.99% | -18.97% | 91.83% | 44.43% | -40.37% | -10.73% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 61.37% | 91.91% | -18.84% | 19.16% | -27.50% | -7.54% | 42.64% | 8.88% | -21.30% | 3.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between HL and FLKR is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | 0.32 |
The correlation between HL and FLKR shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HL vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank
HL
FLKR
HL vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hecla Mining Company (HL) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HL | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.36 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 3.46 | -0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.75 | 12.27 | -7.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HL vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HL drawdown since its inception was -97.92%, which is greater than FLKR's maximum drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HL and FLKR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HL | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.92% | -50.06% | -47.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.81% | -34.17% | -21.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.81% | -34.17% | -21.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.81% | -47.97% | -7.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.59% | -28.42% | -27.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.88% | -21.96% | -47.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.92% | 9.61% | +21.31% |
Volatility
HL vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hecla Mining Company (HL) is 17.22%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 21.39%. This indicates that HL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HL | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.22% | 21.39% | -4.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.30% | 50.33% | +0.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.85% | 53.42% | +20.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.58% | 32.16% | +27.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.79% | 29.79% | +33.00% |
Dividends
HL vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison
HL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than FLKR's 2.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 2.86% | 3.87% | 7.08% | 2.28% | 3.13% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 2.09% | 1.86% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HL Hecla Mining Company | 0.11% | 0.08% | 0.81% | 0.65% | 0.40% | 0.72% | 0.25% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.25% | 0.19% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HL and FLKR have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLKR has higher volatility (21.39%) compared to HL (17.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HL dropped -97.92% vs FLKR's -50.06%.
FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HL and FLKR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer