PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
HL vs. FRES.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


HLFRES.L
YTD Return16.99%7.83%
1Y Return32.89%17.86%
3Y Return (Ann)-3.31%-11.00%
5Y Return (Ann)19.21%2.80%
10Y Return (Ann)8.71%0.67%
Sharpe Ratio0.610.49
Sortino Ratio1.250.97
Omega Ratio1.141.11
Calmar Ratio0.390.26
Martin Ratio2.211.58
Ulcer Index14.87%12.28%
Daily Std Dev53.82%39.03%
Max Drawdown-97.96%-82.36%
Current Drawdown-75.62%-61.10%

Fundamentals


HLFRES.L
Market Cap$3.48B£4.75B
EPS-$0.07£0.25
PEG Ratio-3.020.00
Total Revenue (TTM)$1.17B£2.85B
Gross Profit (TTM)$122.36M£609.46M
EBITDA (TTM)$222.71M£954.39M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between HL and FRES.L is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

HL vs. FRES.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, HL achieves a 16.99% return, which is significantly higher than FRES.L's 7.83% return. Over the past 10 years, HL has outperformed FRES.L with an annualized return of 8.71%, while FRES.L has yielded a comparatively lower 0.67% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.32%
6.95%
HL
FRES.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HL vs. FRES.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hecla Mining Company (HL) and Fresnillo plc (FRES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HL, currently valued at 0.39, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.39
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HL, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.96
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HL, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.11
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HL, currently valued at 0.30, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.30
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HL, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.38
FRES.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FRES.L, currently valued at 0.49, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.49
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FRES.L, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.97
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FRES.L, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.12
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FRES.L, currently valued at 0.26, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.26
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FRES.L, currently valued at 1.62, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.62

HL vs. FRES.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HL Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is comparable to the FRES.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HL and FRES.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.39
0.49
HL
FRES.L

Dividends

HL vs. FRES.L - Dividend Comparison

HL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than FRES.L's 1.69% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
HL
Hecla Mining Company
0.57%0.50%0.40%0.71%0.28%0.35%0.51%0.30%0.28%0.63%0.43%0.71%
FRES.L
Fresnillo plc
1.69%2.47%3.04%3.74%1.26%3.01%4.71%2.28%0.74%0.61%0.91%6.04%

Drawdowns

HL vs. FRES.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HL drawdown since its inception was -97.96%, which is greater than FRES.L's maximum drawdown of -82.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HL and FRES.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-47.32%
-68.25%
HL
FRES.L

Volatility

HL vs. FRES.L - Volatility Comparison

Hecla Mining Company (HL) and Fresnillo plc (FRES.L) have volatilities of 15.04% and 15.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.04%
15.69%
HL
FRES.L

Financials

HL vs. FRES.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hecla Mining Company and Fresnillo plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. HL values in USD, FRES.L values in GBp