HL vs. AG
HL (Hecla Mining Company) and AG (First Majestic Silver Corp.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — HL in Other Precious Metals & Mining, AG in Silver. Over the past 10 years, HL returned 8.43%/yr vs -1.67%/yr for AG. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
HL vs. AG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HL achieves a -26.39% return, which is significantly lower than AG's -9.68% return. Over the past 10 years, HL has outperformed AG with an annualized return of 8.43%, while AG has yielded a comparatively lower -1.67% annualized return.
HL
- 1D
- -5.43%
- 1M
- -13.53%
- 6M
- -37.28%
- YTD
- -26.39%
- 1Y
- 148.44%
- 3Y*
- 37.43%
- 5Y*
- 16.67%
- 10Y*
- 8.43%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.08%
AG
- 1D
- -4.21%
- 1M
- -15.66%
- 6M
- -27.79%
- YTD
- -9.68%
- 1Y
- 92.36%
- 3Y*
- 33.31%
- 5Y*
- 2.14%
- 10Y*
- -1.67%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $178.27M | $175.82M | $226.19M | |
| $675.62M | $596.53M | $453.27M |
HL vs. AG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HL Hecla Mining Company | -26.39% | 291.70% | 2.82% | -12.93% | 6.99% | -18.97% | 91.83% | 44.43% | -40.37% | -24.08% |
AG First Majestic Silver Corp. | -9.68% | 204.32% | -10.47% | -25.99% | -24.73% | -17.24% | 9.62% | 108.15% | -12.61% | -11.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between HL and AG is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2010 | 0.78 |
The correlation between HL and AG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
HL:
$9.47B
AG:
$7.41B
HL:
$0.83
AG:
$0.70
HL:
17.01
AG:
21.51
HL:
0.07
AG:
0.38
HL:
6.05
AG:
4.54
HL:
3.71
AG:
2.54
HL:
$1.57B
AG:
$1.64B
HL:
$788.95M
AG:
$863.95M
HL:
$864.40M
AG:
$1.02B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HL vs. AG — Risk / Return Rank
HL
AG
HL vs. AG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hecla Mining Company (HL) and First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HL | AG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.22 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 1.70 | +0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.75 | 3.35 | +1.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HL vs. AG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HL drawdown since its inception was -97.92%, which is greater than AG's maximum drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HL and AG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HL | AG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.92% | -90.20% | -7.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.81% | -53.00% | -2.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.81% | -53.00% | -2.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.81% | -70.28% | +14.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.45% | -80.82% | -1.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.59% | -53.00% | -2.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.88% | -59.08% | -10.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.92% | 26.79% | +4.13% |
Volatility
HL vs. AG - Volatility Comparison
Hecla Mining Company (HL) and First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) have volatilities of 17.22% and 18.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HL | AG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.22% | 18.02% | -0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.30% | 57.35% | -6.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.85% | 74.97% | -1.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.58% | 62.17% | -2.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.79% | 61.87% | +0.92% |
Dividends
HL vs. AG - Dividend Comparison
HL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than AG's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AG First Majestic Silver Corp. | 0.24% | 0.12% | 0.33% | 0.34% | 0.31% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HL Hecla Mining Company | 0.11% | 0.08% | 0.81% | 0.65% | 0.40% | 0.72% | 0.25% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.25% | 0.19% | 0.53% |
Financials
HL vs. AG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hecla Mining Company and First Majestic Silver Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HL vs. AG - Profitability Comparison
HL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a gross profit of 253.26M and revenue of 411.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.
AG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First Majestic Silver Corp. reported a gross profit of 266.81M and revenue of 415.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.2%.
HL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported an operating income of 223.11M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 54.2%.
AG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First Majestic Silver Corp. reported an operating income of 197.54M and revenue of 415.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 47.5%.
HL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a net income of 266.45M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in a net margin of 64.8%.
AG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First Majestic Silver Corp. reported a net income of 109.43M and revenue of 415.50M, resulting in a net margin of 26.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HL and AG have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AG has higher volatility (18.02%) compared to HL (17.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HL dropped -97.92% vs AG's -90.20%.
HL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HL and AG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer