PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HL vs. UAMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HL vs. UAMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hecla Mining Company (HL) and United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HL achieves a -16.80% return, which is significantly lower than UAMY's 56.37% return. Over the past 10 years, HL has underperformed UAMY with an annualized return of 13.60%, while UAMY has yielded a comparatively higher 41.96% annualized return.


HL

1D
-0.62%
1M
-6.01%
YTD
-16.80%
6M
-18.83%
1Y
176.93%
3Y*
45.11%
5Y*
16.73%
10Y*
13.60%

UAMY

1D
2.48%
1M
-6.77%
YTD
56.37%
6M
62.86%
1Y
187.55%
3Y*
186.16%
5Y*
55.03%
10Y*
41.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HL vs. UAMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HL
Hecla Mining Company
-16.80%291.70%2.82%-12.93%6.99%-18.97%91.83%44.43%-40.37%-24.08%
UAMY
United States Antimony Corporation
56.37%183.62%610.84%-48.86%-2.19%-4.64%35.58%-33.62%81.25%27.49%

Correlation

The correlation between HL and UAMY is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2000

0.09

Over the past year, HL and UAMY have become more correlated (0.31) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HL:

$10.78B

UAMY:

$1.11B

EPS

HL:

$0.84

UAMY:

-$0.13

PS Ratio

HL:

6.75

UAMY:

25.93

PB Ratio

HL:

4.19

UAMY:

8.43

Total Revenue (TTM)

HL:

$1.57B

UAMY:

$39.04M

Gross Profit (TTM)

HL:

$788.95M

UAMY:

$4.34M

EBITDA (TTM)

HL:

$864.40M

UAMY:

-$15.23M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HL vs. UAMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HL
HL Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
HL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
HL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
HL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
HL Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

UAMY
UAMY Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
UAMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UAMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
UAMY Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
UAMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
UAMY Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HL vs. UAMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hecla Mining Company (HL) and United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HLUAMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.26

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

2.31

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.68

3.93

+2.75

HL vs. UAMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HL Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the UAMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HL and UAMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HL vs. UAMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HL drawdown since its inception was -97.92%, roughly equal to the maximum UAMY drawdown of -96.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HL and UAMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLUAMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.92%

-96.44%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.81%

-74.30%

+18.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.81%

-74.30%

+18.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.07%

-80.46%

+23.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.45%

-89.76%

+7.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.81%

-55.07%

+5.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.92%

-66.40%

-3.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.41%

43.73%

-18.32%

Volatility

HL vs. UAMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hecla Mining Company (HL) is 21.47%, while United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) has a volatility of 29.71%. This indicates that HL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UAMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLUAMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.47%

29.71%

-8.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.38%

92.65%

-38.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.17%

132.33%

-59.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.33%

95.15%

-35.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.81%

101.05%

-38.24%

Dividends

HL vs. UAMY - Dividend Comparison

HL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, while UAMY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HL
Hecla Mining Company
0.09%0.08%0.81%0.65%0.40%0.72%0.25%0.29%0.42%0.25%0.19%0.53%
UAMY
United States Antimony Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

HL vs. UAMY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hecla Mining Company and United States Antimony Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
411.43M
6.78M
(HL) Total Revenue
(UAMY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


HL and UAMY have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UAMY has higher volatility (29.71%) compared to HL (21.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HL dropped -97.92% vs UAMY's -96.44%.

HL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HL and UAMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer