HERO vs. VUG
HERO (Global X Video Games & Esports ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - HERO tracks the Solactive Video Games & Esports Index while VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HERO returned -3.62%/yr vs 15.11%/yr for VUG. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HERO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
HERO vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HERO achieves a -13.80% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 9.49% return.
HERO
- 1D
- -2.41%
- 1M
- -2.63%
- YTD
- -13.80%
- 6M
- -16.14%
- 1Y
- -12.41%
- 3Y*
- 9.75%
- 5Y*
- -3.62%
- 10Y*
- —
VUG
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 27.84%
- 3Y*
- 25.93%
- 5Y*
- 15.11%
- 10Y*
- 18.26%
HERO vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | -13.80% | 28.74% | 17.65% | 8.36% | -33.42% | -8.37% | 91.02% | 9.12% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 9.49% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 7.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between HERO and VUG is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2019 | 0.66 |
The correlation between HERO and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
HERO vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HERO
VUG
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
HERO
VUG
Technology
HERO
VUG
Industrials
HERO
VUG
Basic Materials
HERO
-
VUG
Consumer Cyclical
HERO
-
VUG
Consumer Defensive
HERO
-
VUG
Energy
HERO
-
VUG
Financial Services
HERO
-
VUG
Healthcare
HERO
-
VUG
Real Estate
HERO
-
VUG
Utilities
HERO
-
VUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HERO vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
HERO
VUG
HERO vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HERO | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | 1.77 | -2.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | 2.40 | -3.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.31 | -0.40 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 1.69 | -2.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 5.92 | -6.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HERO | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.64 | 1.77 | -2.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | 0.68 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.62 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
HERO vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HERO drawdown since its inception was -54.02%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERO and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HERO | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.02% | -50.68% | -3.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.64% | -16.53% | -10.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.64% | -22.85% | -3.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.44% | -35.61% | -12.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.46% | -1.51% | -25.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.97% | -7.09% | -18.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.11% | 4.71% | +9.40% |
Volatility
HERO vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) has a higher volatility of 5.13% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 3.83%. This indicates that HERO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HERO | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 3.83% | +1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.10% | 12.11% | +2.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.52% | 15.84% | +3.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.37% | 22.22% | +1.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.50% | 21.44% | +3.06% |
HERO vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
HERO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
HERO vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
HERO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | 1.88% | 1.62% | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.28% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HERO and VUG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HERO has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to VUG (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HERO dropped -54.02% vs VUG's -50.68%.
On 5-year performance, VUG leads with 15.11% vs -3.62% for HERO. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VUG has performed better with a 15.11% return vs -3.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HERO.
HERO has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 0.37% for VUG.
HERO tracks Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HERO and 0.03% for VUG.
VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HERO and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer