PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HERO vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HERO vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HERO achieves a -13.80% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.88% return.


HERO

1D
-2.41%
1M
-2.63%
YTD
-13.80%
6M
-16.14%
1Y
-12.41%
3Y*
9.75%
5Y*
-3.62%
10Y*

QYLD

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.62%
YTD
7.88%
6M
9.97%
1Y
23.93%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
9.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HERO vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HERO
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF
-13.80%28.74%17.65%8.36%-33.42%-8.37%91.02%9.12%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
7.88%9.28%19.35%22.77%-19.08%10.41%8.72%3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between HERO and QYLD is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2019

0.60

The correlation between HERO and QYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HERO vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HERO
QYLD

Communication Services

93.0%
15.8%

Technology

5.6%
53.8%

Industrials

1.4%
2.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Communication Services

HERO
93.0%
QYLD
15.8%

Technology

HERO
5.6%
QYLD
53.8%

Industrials

HERO
1.4%
QYLD
2.8%

Basic Materials

HERO

-

QYLD
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

HERO

-

QYLD
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

HERO

-

QYLD
7.7%

Energy

HERO

-

QYLD
0.6%

Financial Services

HERO

-

QYLD
0.2%

Healthcare

HERO

-

QYLD
4.2%

Real Estate

HERO

-

QYLD
0.1%

Utilities

HERO

-

QYLD
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HERO vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HERO
HERO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
HERO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HERO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
HERO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
HERO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
HERO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HERO vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HEROQYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.63

-0.72

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.47

4.84

-5.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.88

28.36

-29.24

HERO vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HERO Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HERO and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HEROQYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.64

2.80

-3.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

0.58

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.59

-0.21

Drawdowns

HERO vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HERO drawdown since its inception was -54.02%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERO and QYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HEROQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.02%

-24.75%

-29.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.64%

-4.97%

-21.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.64%

-19.06%

-7.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.44%

-24.61%

-23.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.46%

-0.06%

-27.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.97%

-3.84%

-22.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.11%

0.85%

+13.26%

Volatility

HERO vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) has a higher volatility of 5.13% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.85%. This indicates that HERO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HEROQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.13%

1.85%

+3.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.10%

7.12%

+7.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.52%

8.58%

+10.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.37%

14.70%

+8.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.50%

15.49%

+9.01%

HERO vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

HERO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

HERO vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

HERO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than QYLD's 11.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HERO
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF
1.88%1.62%1.06%0.73%0.28%0.79%0.71%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.46%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


HERO and QYLD have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HERO has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to QYLD (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HERO dropped -54.02% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

On 5-year performance, QYLD leads with 8.43% vs -3.62% for HERO. On fees, HERO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QYLD has performed better with a 8.43% return vs -3.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HERO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.46%, compared with 1.88% for HERO.

HERO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. HERO tracks Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HERO and 0.60% for QYLD.

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HERO and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer