HERO vs. QYLD
HERO (Global X Video Games & Esports ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HERO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HERO returned -1.39%/yr vs 7.94%/yr for QYLD. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HERO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.
Performance
HERO vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HERO achieves a -10.56% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 8.73% return.
HERO
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- 6M
- -9.80%
- YTD
- -10.56%
- 1Y
- -13.47%
- 3Y*
- 10.27%
- 5Y*
- -1.39%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.68%
QYLD
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 6.38%
- YTD
- 8.73%
- 1Y
- 21.85%
- 3Y*
- 13.13%
- 5Y*
- 7.94%
- 10Y*
- 9.65%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $881.17K | $612.17K | $690.19K | |
| $81.92M | $78.72M | $98.91M |
HERO vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | -10.56% | 28.74% | 17.65% | 8.36% | -33.42% | -8.37% | 91.02% | 9.12% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 8.73% | 9.28% | 19.35% | 22.77% | -19.08% | 10.41% | 8.72% | 3.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between HERO and QYLD is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019 | 0.59 |
The correlation between HERO and QYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HERO vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HERO
QYLD
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
HERO
QYLD
Technology
HERO
QYLD
Industrials
HERO
QYLD
Basic Materials
HERO
-
QYLD
Consumer Cyclical
HERO
-
QYLD
Consumer Defensive
HERO
-
QYLD
Energy
HERO
-
QYLD
Financial Services
HERO
-
QYLD
Healthcare
HERO
-
QYLD
Real Estate
HERO
-
QYLD
Utilities
HERO
-
QYLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HERO vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
HERO
QYLD
HERO vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HERO | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.40 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | 3.80 | -4.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | 17.57 | -18.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HERO vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HERO drawdown since its inception was -54.02%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERO and QYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HERO | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.02% | -24.75% | -29.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.78% | -5.78% | -25.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.78% | -19.06% | -11.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.42% | -24.61% | -21.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.74% | -2.00% | -22.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.02% | -3.81% | -22.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.64% | 1.25% | +16.39% |
Volatility
HERO vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 5.17%. This indicates that HERO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HERO | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.39% | 5.17% | +2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.13% | 10.07% | +6.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.63% | 11.26% | +9.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.48% | 15.05% | +8.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.45% | 15.64% | +8.81% |
HERO vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
HERO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
HERO vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
HERO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than QYLD's 11.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | 1.74% | 1.62% | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.28% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.78% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HERO and QYLD have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HERO has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to QYLD (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HERO dropped -54.02% vs QYLD's -24.75%.
On 5-year performance, QYLD leads with 7.94% vs -1.39% for HERO. On fees, HERO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 5.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QYLD has performed better with a 7.94% return vs -1.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HERO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.
QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.78%, compared with 1.74% for HERO.
HERO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. HERO tracks Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HERO and 0.60% for QYLD.
QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HERO and QYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer