PortfoliosLab logo
QYLD vs. QYLG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QYLD and QYLG is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

QYLD vs. QYLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QYLD:

0.24

QYLG:

0.43

Sortino Ratio

QYLD:

0.47

QYLG:

0.72

Omega Ratio

QYLD:

1.08

QYLG:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

QYLD:

0.23

QYLG:

0.41

Martin Ratio

QYLD:

0.81

QYLG:

1.44

Ulcer Index

QYLD:

5.47%

QYLG:

5.95%

Daily Std Dev

QYLD:

19.10%

QYLG:

21.44%

Max Drawdown

QYLD:

-24.75%

QYLG:

-29.98%

Current Drawdown

QYLD:

-11.10%

QYLG:

-7.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QYLD achieves a -7.09% return, which is significantly lower than QYLG's -3.35% return.


QYLD

YTD

-7.09%

1M

0.57%

6M

-4.75%

1Y

4.10%

3Y*

9.87%

5Y*

7.69%

10Y*

7.55%

QYLG

YTD

-3.35%

1M

4.97%

6M

-1.77%

1Y

7.93%

3Y*

15.86%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QYLD vs. QYLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QYLD and QYLG have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QYLD vs. QYLG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QYLD is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QYLD is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QYLG is 5050
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QYLG is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QYLG is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QYLG is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QYLG is 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QYLG is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QYLD vs. QYLG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current QYLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the QYLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QYLD and QYLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

QYLD vs. QYLG - Dividend Comparison

QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.00%, less than QYLG's 27.45% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
14.00%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%10.74%
QYLG
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
27.45%25.27%5.43%6.91%10.15%1.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QYLD vs. QYLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QYLD drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, smaller than the maximum QYLG drawdown of -29.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLD and QYLG.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

QYLD vs. QYLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) is 1.17%, while Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) has a volatility of 3.08%. This indicates that QYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...