QYLD vs. SCHD
QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QYLD returned 10.07%/yr vs 12.48%/yr for SCHD. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QYLD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
QYLD vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QYLD achieves a 10.20% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.13% return. Over the past 10 years, QYLD has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 10.07%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.48% annualized return.
QYLD
- 1D
- 2.43%
- 1M
- 4.04%
- YTD
- 10.20%
- 6M
- 10.75%
- 1Y
- 25.53%
- 3Y*
- 14.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.95%
- 10Y*
- 10.07%
SCHD
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- 17.13%
- 6M
- 17.00%
- 1Y
- 24.22%
- 3Y*
- 13.38%
- 5Y*
- 9.07%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
QYLD vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 10.20% | 9.28% | 19.35% | 22.77% | -19.08% | 10.41% | 8.72% | 22.69% | -3.07% | 18.79% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 17.13% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between QYLD and SCHD is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QYLD and SCHD has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
QYLD vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QYLD
SCHD
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
QYLD
SCHD
Communication Services
QYLD
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
QYLD
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
QYLD
SCHD
Healthcare
QYLD
SCHD
Industrials
QYLD
SCHD
Utilities
QYLD
SCHD
Basic Materials
QYLD
SCHD
Energy
QYLD
SCHD
Financial Services
QYLD
SCHD
Real Estate
QYLD
SCHD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QYLD vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
QYLD
SCHD
QYLD vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QYLD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.39 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.16 | 5.27 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 29.06 | 12.86 | +16.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QYLD vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QYLD drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLD and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QYLD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.75% | -33.37% | +8.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.97% | -4.61% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.06% | -16.13% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.61% | -16.85% | -7.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.75% | -33.37% | +8.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.95% | +2.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -3.31% | -0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | 1.89% | -1.01% |
Volatility
QYLD vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a higher volatility of 4.30% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.58%. This indicates that QYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QYLD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.30% | 3.58% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.24% | 7.75% | +0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.49% | 11.07% | -1.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.81% | 14.38% | +0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.54% | 16.73% | -1.19% |
QYLD vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
QYLD vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.22%, more than SCHD's 3.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.22% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.31% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QYLD and SCHD have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QYLD has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to SCHD (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QYLD dropped -24.75% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.48% vs 10.07% for QYLD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.48% return vs 10.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.
QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.22%, compared with 3.31% for SCHD.
QYLD is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SCHD is Dividend. QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QYLD and 0.06% for SCHD.
QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QYLD and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer