PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QYLD vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QYLD vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QYLD achieves a 6.97% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 23.81% return. Over the past 10 years, QYLD has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 9.49%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.66% annualized return.


QYLD

1D
2.32%
1M
-3.43%
6M
4.84%
YTD
6.97%
1Y
18.45%
3Y*
12.12%
5Y*
7.69%
10Y*
9.49%
ALL TIME*
8.51%

SCHD

1D
-1.24%
1M
5.36%
6M
15.63%
YTD
23.81%
1Y
29.05%
3Y*
13.95%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
12.66%
ALL TIME*
13.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$91.97M$78.44M$98.68M
$774.37M$705.56M$682.78M

QYLD vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
6.97%9.28%19.35%22.77%-19.08%10.41%8.72%22.69%-3.07%18.79%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
23.81%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between QYLD and SCHD is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between QYLD and SCHD has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

QYLD vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QYLD
SCHD

Technology

62.7%
12.7%

Communication Services

13.0%
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.6%
20.6%

Industrials

4.1%
7.8%

Healthcare

3.7%
20.8%

Utilities

1.3%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.2%

Energy

0.5%
14.1%

Financial Services

0.2%
9.9%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

QYLD
62.7%
SCHD
12.7%

Communication Services

QYLD
13.0%
SCHD
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

QYLD
10.9%
SCHD
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

QYLD
6.6%
SCHD
20.6%

Industrials

QYLD
4.1%
SCHD
7.8%

Healthcare

QYLD
3.7%
SCHD
20.8%

Utilities

QYLD
1.3%
SCHD
0.1%

Basic Materials

QYLD
1.1%
SCHD
1.2%

Energy

QYLD
0.5%
SCHD
14.1%

Financial Services

QYLD
0.2%
SCHD
9.9%

Real Estate

QYLD
0.1%
SCHD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QYLD vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QYLD vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QYLDSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.47

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

6.32

-3.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.06

15.99

-0.93

QYLD vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QYLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QYLD and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QYLD vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QYLD drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLD and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QYLDSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.75%

-33.37%

+8.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.78%

-4.61%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

-16.13%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

-16.85%

-7.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

-33.37%

+8.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.59%

-1.42%

-2.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.81%

-3.30%

-0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

1.83%

-0.60%

Volatility

QYLD vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a higher volatility of 5.16% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 4.11%. This indicates that QYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QYLDSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.16%

4.11%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.02%

8.11%

+1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.24%

11.21%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.04%

14.40%

+0.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.63%

16.72%

-1.09%

QYLD vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

QYLD vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.97%, more than SCHD's 3.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.97%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.14%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


QYLD and SCHD have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QYLD has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to SCHD (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QYLD dropped -24.75% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.66% vs 9.49% for QYLD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.66% return vs 9.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.97%, compared with 3.14% for SCHD.

QYLD is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SCHD is Dividend. QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QYLD and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QYLD and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer