PortfoliosLab logo
QYLD vs. XYLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QYLD and XYLD is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

QYLD vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QYLD:

-0.19

XYLD:

0.53

Sortino Ratio

QYLD:

-0.13

XYLD:

0.87

Omega Ratio

QYLD:

0.98

XYLD:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

QYLD:

-0.09

XYLD:

0.52

Martin Ratio

QYLD:

-0.64

XYLD:

2.13

Ulcer Index

QYLD:

5.42%

XYLD:

3.78%

Daily Std Dev

QYLD:

19.25%

XYLD:

15.28%

Max Drawdown

QYLD:

-40.69%

XYLD:

-33.46%

Current Drawdown

QYLD:

-34.36%

XYLD:

-7.47%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QYLD achieves a -8.21% return, which is significantly lower than XYLD's -4.44% return. Over the past 10 years, QYLD has underperformed XYLD with an annualized return of -3.27%, while XYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 6.38% annualized return.


QYLD

YTD

-8.21%

1M

-0.24%

6M

-8.18%

1Y

-3.55%

5Y*

-3.64%

10Y*

-3.27%

XYLD

YTD

-4.44%

1M

1.06%

6M

-1.55%

1Y

7.98%

5Y*

9.72%

10Y*

6.38%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QYLD vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QYLD and XYLD have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

QYLD vs. XYLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QYLD is 99
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QYLD is 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QYLD is 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QYLD is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QYLD is 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QYLD is 88
Martin Ratio Rank

XYLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XYLD is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XYLD is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XYLD is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XYLD is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XYLD is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XYLD is 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QYLD vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current QYLD Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QYLD and XYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

QYLD vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.73%, more than XYLD's 12.95% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
13.73%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%10.74%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
12.95%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%4.15%

Drawdowns

QYLD vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QYLD drawdown since its inception was -40.69%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLD and XYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

QYLD vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 3.23%. This indicates that QYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...