HERO vs. PAVE
HERO (Global X Video Games & Esports ETF) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HERO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while PAVE is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HERO returned -3.62%/yr vs 17.39%/yr for PAVE. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HERO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVE.
Performance
HERO vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HERO achieves a -13.80% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 19.88% return.
HERO
- 1D
- -2.41%
- 1M
- -2.63%
- YTD
- -13.80%
- 6M
- -16.14%
- 1Y
- -12.41%
- 3Y*
- 9.75%
- 5Y*
- -3.62%
- 10Y*
- —
PAVE
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 19.88%
- 6M
- 18.87%
- 1Y
- 37.15%
- 3Y*
- 26.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.39%
- 10Y*
- —
HERO vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | -13.80% | 28.74% | 17.65% | 8.36% | -33.42% | -8.37% | 91.02% | 9.12% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 19.88% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 7.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between HERO and PAVE is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2019 | 0.46 |
The correlation between HERO and PAVE shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HERO vs. PAVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HERO
PAVE
Communication Services
-
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
HERO
PAVE
-
Technology
HERO
PAVE
Industrials
HERO
PAVE
Basic Materials
HERO
-
PAVE
Consumer Cyclical
HERO
-
PAVE
-
Consumer Defensive
HERO
-
PAVE
Energy
HERO
-
PAVE
Financial Services
HERO
-
PAVE
-
Healthcare
HERO
-
PAVE
-
Real Estate
HERO
-
PAVE
-
Utilities
HERO
-
PAVE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HERO vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank
HERO
PAVE
HERO vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HERO | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | 1.99 | -2.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | 2.82 | -3.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.34 | -0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 3.13 | -3.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 11.50 | -12.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HERO | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.64 | 1.99 | -2.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | 0.81 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.68 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
HERO vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HERO drawdown since its inception was -54.02%, which is greater than PAVE's maximum drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERO and PAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HERO | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.02% | -44.08% | -9.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.64% | -11.91% | -14.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.64% | -26.23% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.44% | -26.23% | -22.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.46% | -1.82% | -25.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.97% | -6.24% | -19.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.11% | 3.24% | +10.87% |
Volatility
HERO vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) is 5.13%, while Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that HERO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HERO | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 6.42% | -1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.10% | 15.17% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.52% | 18.84% | +0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.37% | 21.60% | +1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.50% | 24.38% | +0.12% |
HERO vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
HERO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
HERO vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison
HERO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than PAVE's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | 1.88% | 1.62% | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.28% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HERO and PAVE have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAVE has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to HERO (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HERO dropped -54.02% vs PAVE's -44.08%.
On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 17.39% vs -3.62% for HERO. On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, HERO has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 17.39% return vs -3.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HERO.
HERO has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 0.77% for PAVE.
HERO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PAVE is Utilities Equities. HERO tracks Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HERO and 0.47% for PAVE.
PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HERO and PAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer