HERO vs. FITZ
HERO (Global X Video Games & Esports ETF) and FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. HERO is passively managed, while FITZ is actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HERO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FITZ.
Performance
HERO vs. FITZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HERO
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- -14.99%
- 6M
- -17.25%
- 1Y
- -15.17%
- 3Y*
- 9.00%
- 5Y*
- -3.89%
- 10Y*
- —
FITZ
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HERO vs. FITZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | -0.96% |
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | -1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between HERO and FITZ is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HERO vs. FITZ — Risk / Return Rank
HERO
FITZ
HERO vs. FITZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HERO | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HERO | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | -7.29 | +7.66 |
Drawdowns
HERO vs. FITZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HERO drawdown since its inception was -54.02%, which is greater than FITZ's maximum drawdown of -1.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERO and FITZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HERO | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.02% | -1.97% | -52.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.47% | -1.97% | -26.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.97% | -1.08% | -24.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.20% | — | — |
Volatility
HERO vs. FITZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HERO | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.28% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.57% | 8.74% | +10.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.36% | 8.74% | +14.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.50% | 8.74% | +15.76% |
HERO vs. FITZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
HERO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FITZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
HERO vs. FITZ - Dividend Comparison
HERO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, while FITZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | 1.91% | 1.62% | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.28% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HERO and FITZ have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HERO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HERO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FITZ.
HERO has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.00% for FITZ.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HERO and 0.75% for FITZ.
Find the right allocation for HERO and FITZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer