HEFA vs. GSIE
HEFA (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF) and GSIE (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - HEFA tracks the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to USD Index while GSIE tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HEFA returned 12.70%/yr vs 9.39%/yr for GSIE. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. HEFA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GSIE.
Performance
HEFA vs. GSIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEFA achieves a 13.57% return, which is significantly higher than GSIE's 8.75% return. Over the past 10 years, HEFA has outperformed GSIE with an annualized return of 12.70%, while GSIE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.39% annualized return.
HEFA
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 10.08%
- YTD
- 13.57%
- 1Y
- 26.09%
- 3Y*
- 18.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.96%
- 10Y*
- 12.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.79%
GSIE
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 17.13%
- 3Y*
- 15.96%
- 5Y*
- 8.63%
- 10Y*
- 9.39%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.80%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $16.98M | $19.56M | $19.60M | |
| $39.23M | $30.73M | $26.09M |
HEFA vs. GSIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEFA iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF | 13.57% | 24.58% | 13.71% | 20.33% | -4.86% | 19.59% | 2.09% | 27.63% | -9.33% | 16.67% |
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF | 8.75% | 32.53% | 5.23% | 16.99% | -15.86% | 13.27% | 7.45% | 22.83% | -13.40% | 26.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEFA and GSIE is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2015 | 0.86 |
The correlation between HEFA and GSIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
HEFA vs. GSIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HEFA
GSIE
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
HEFA
GSIE
Industrials
HEFA
GSIE
Technology
HEFA
GSIE
Healthcare
HEFA
GSIE
Consumer Cyclical
HEFA
GSIE
Consumer Defensive
HEFA
GSIE
Basic Materials
HEFA
GSIE
Energy
HEFA
GSIE
Utilities
HEFA
GSIE
Communication Services
HEFA
GSIE
Real Estate
HEFA
GSIE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEFA vs. GSIE — Risk / Return Rank
HEFA
GSIE
HEFA vs. GSIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HEFA | GSIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.21 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 1.58 | +1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.52 | 5.99 | +5.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HEFA vs. GSIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEFA drawdown since its inception was -32.39%, smaller than the maximum GSIE drawdown of -34.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEFA and GSIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEFA | GSIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.39% | -34.63% | +2.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.52% | -10.76% | +1.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.28% | -13.07% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.79% | -29.97% | +15.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.39% | -34.63% | +2.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -1.06% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.13% | -5.99% | +1.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 2.84% | -0.55% |
Volatility
HEFA vs. GSIE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA) is 3.21%, while Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) has a volatility of 3.56%. This indicates that HEFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEFA | GSIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | 3.56% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.72% | 12.39% | -1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.05% | 14.49% | -1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.82% | 16.08% | -2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.66% | 16.49% | -0.83% |
HEFA vs. GSIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEFA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEFA vs. GSIE - Dividend Comparison
HEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, more than GSIE's 2.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF | 2.56% | 2.65% | 3.11% | 2.87% | 3.01% | 2.40% | 1.60% | 2.80% | 2.68% | 2.31% | 2.15% | 0.13% |
HEFA iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF | 4.04% | 4.40% | 3.09% | 3.02% | 25.14% | 3.06% | 2.10% | 7.56% | 4.58% | 2.55% | 3.17% | 3.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEFA and GSIE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSIE has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to HEFA (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEFA dropped -32.39% vs GSIE's -34.63%.
On 10-year performance, HEFA leads with 12.70% vs 9.39% for GSIE. On fees, GSIE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, HEFA has been the lower-risk option at 3.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HEFA has performed better with a 12.70% return vs 9.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSIE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HEFA.
HEFA has the higher dividend yield at 4.04%, compared with 2.56% for GSIE.
HEFA tracks MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to USD Index, while GSIE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HEFA and 0.25% for GSIE.
HEFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HEFA and GSIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer