PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEFA vs. HEWJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HEFA vs. HEWJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEFA achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly lower than HEWJ's 19.76% return. Over the past 10 years, HEFA has underperformed HEWJ with an annualized return of 12.65%, while HEWJ has yielded a comparatively higher 16.41% annualized return.


HEFA

1D
0.66%
1M
4.11%
YTD
10.74%
6M
13.13%
1Y
26.32%
3Y*
18.49%
5Y*
13.71%
10Y*
12.65%

HEWJ

1D
0.72%
1M
7.95%
YTD
19.76%
6M
23.07%
1Y
51.12%
3Y*
28.87%
5Y*
21.37%
10Y*
16.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEFA vs. HEWJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HEFA
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF
10.74%24.58%13.71%20.33%-4.86%19.59%2.09%27.63%-9.33%16.67%
HEWJ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF
19.76%30.25%24.80%36.21%-4.39%12.79%10.29%20.79%-14.68%21.47%

Correlation

The correlation between HEFA and HEWJ is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2014

0.82

The correlation between HEFA and HEWJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

HEFA vs. HEWJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HEFA
HEWJ

Financial Services

24.3%
17.6%

Industrials

19.3%
26.0%

Technology

11.0%
19.1%

Healthcare

10.1%
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
3.6%

Basic Materials

6.2%
3.0%

Communication Services

4.4%
7.9%

Energy

3.8%
1.1%

Utilities

3.7%
1.1%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.3%

Financial Services

HEFA
24.3%
HEWJ
17.6%

Industrials

HEFA
19.3%
HEWJ
26.0%

Technology

HEFA
11.0%
HEWJ
19.1%

Healthcare

HEFA
10.1%
HEWJ
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

HEFA
7.4%
HEWJ
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

HEFA
6.8%
HEWJ
3.6%

Basic Materials

HEFA
6.2%
HEWJ
3.0%

Communication Services

HEFA
4.4%
HEWJ
7.9%

Energy

HEFA
3.8%
HEWJ
1.1%

Utilities

HEFA
3.7%
HEWJ
1.1%

Real Estate

HEFA
1.8%
HEWJ
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HEFA vs. HEWJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEFA
HEFA Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
HEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
HEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

HEWJ
HEWJ Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
HEWJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEWJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEWJ Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
HEWJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEWJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEFA vs. HEWJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HEFAHEWJDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.10

2.75

-0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.94

3.81

-0.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.50

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

5.00

-2.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.83

19.65

-7.81

HEFA vs. HEWJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEFA Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the HEWJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEFA and HEWJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HEFAHEWJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.75

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

1.13

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.84

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.69

-0.02

Drawdowns

HEFA vs. HEWJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEFA drawdown since its inception was -32.39%, roughly equal to the maximum HEWJ drawdown of -31.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEFA and HEWJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HEFAHEWJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.39%

-31.53%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.52%

-10.37%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.28%

-20.90%

+6.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.79%

-20.90%

+6.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.39%

-31.53%

-0.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-6.62%

+2.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

2.64%

-0.36%

Volatility

HEFA vs. HEWJ - Volatility Comparison

iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) at 3.94%. This indicates that HEFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEWJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HEFAHEWJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.17%

3.94%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.13%

13.70%

-3.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.59%

18.65%

-6.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.76%

19.04%

-5.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.86%

19.66%

-3.80%

HEFA vs. HEWJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEFA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HEWJ's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

HEFA vs. HEWJ - Dividend Comparison

HEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than HEWJ's 4.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HEFA
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF
3.97%4.40%3.09%3.02%25.14%3.06%2.10%7.56%4.58%2.55%3.17%3.54%
HEWJ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF
4.26%5.10%2.20%2.02%47.68%2.03%1.20%2.78%1.37%1.21%1.88%3.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


HEFA and HEWJ have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HEFA has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to HEWJ (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEFA dropped -32.39% vs HEWJ's -31.53%.

On 10-year performance, HEWJ leads with 16.41% vs 12.65% for HEFA. On fees, HEFA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, HEWJ has been the lower-risk option at 3.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HEWJ has performed better with a 16.41% return vs 12.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HEFA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HEWJ.

HEWJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 3.97% for HEFA.

HEFA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while HEWJ is Japan Equities. HEFA tracks MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to USD Index, while HEWJ tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HEFA and 0.49% for HEWJ.

HEWJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HEFA and HEWJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer