HDMV vs. KNG
HDMV (First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF) and KNG (FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HDMV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while KNG is a Dividend fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. HDMV is actively managed, while KNG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HDMV returned 6.31%/yr vs 4.31%/yr for KNG. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HDMV charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for KNG.
Performance
HDMV vs. KNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDMV achieves a 4.23% return, which is significantly higher than KNG's 2.20% return.
HDMV
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 4.23%
- 6M
- 5.97%
- 1Y
- 9.53%
- 3Y*
- 12.63%
- 5Y*
- 6.31%
- 10Y*
- —
KNG
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 2.20%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 7.44%
- 3Y*
- 7.06%
- 5Y*
- 4.31%
- 10Y*
- —
HDMV vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF | 4.23% | 29.31% | 2.99% | 9.62% | -11.47% | 7.39% | -9.42% | 15.00% | -6.33% |
KNG FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 2.20% | 6.63% | 5.99% | 7.48% | -7.03% | 24.78% | 7.21% | 26.64% | -0.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDMV and KNG is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018 | 0.64 |
The correlation between HDMV and KNG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
HDMV vs. KNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDMV
KNG
Financial Services
Industrials
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Financial Services
HDMV
KNG
Industrials
HDMV
KNG
Utilities
HDMV
KNG
Real Estate
HDMV
KNG
Consumer Defensive
HDMV
KNG
Communication Services
HDMV
KNG
-
Healthcare
HDMV
KNG
Consumer Cyclical
HDMV
KNG
Energy
HDMV
KNG
Basic Materials
HDMV
KNG
Technology
HDMV
KNG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDMV vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank
HDMV
KNG
HDMV vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDMV | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.13 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 0.87 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.41 | 2.25 | +1.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDMV | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 0.73 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.32 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.49 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
HDMV vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDMV drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, smaller than the maximum KNG drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDMV and KNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDMV | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.01% | -35.12% | +3.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | -8.61% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.33% | -14.24% | +3.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.11% | -18.20% | -5.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.05% | -5.89% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.77% | -4.13% | -2.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 3.32% | -0.52% |
Volatility
HDMV vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) at 2.29%. This indicates that HDMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDMV | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.83% | 2.29% | +1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.38% | 7.39% | +1.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.16% | 10.19% | +0.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.05% | 13.59% | -1.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.24% | 17.18% | -3.94% |
HDMV vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDMV has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDMV vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison
HDMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, less than KNG's 8.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF | 4.70% | 5.09% | 3.24% | 3.14% | 3.53% | 3.11% | 1.45% | 3.63% | 2.88% | 3.23% | 0.18% |
KNG FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 8.67% | 8.61% | 9.08% | 5.91% | 4.00% | 3.45% | 3.62% | 4.09% | 3.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDMV and KNG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDMV has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to KNG (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDMV dropped -32.01% vs KNG's -35.12%.
On 5-year performance, HDMV leads with 6.31% vs 4.31% for KNG. On fees, KNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, KNG has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HDMV has performed better with a 6.31% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for HDMV.
KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.67%, compared with 4.70% for HDMV.
HDMV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while KNG is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for HDMV and 0.75% for KNG.
HDMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDMV and KNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer