PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDMV vs. KNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDMV vs. KNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDMV achieves a 4.23% return, which is significantly higher than KNG's 2.20% return.


HDMV

1D
-0.67%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
4.23%
6M
5.97%
1Y
9.53%
3Y*
12.63%
5Y*
6.31%
10Y*

KNG

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.20%
6M
2.33%
1Y
7.44%
3Y*
7.06%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDMV vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HDMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF
4.23%29.31%2.99%9.62%-11.47%7.39%-9.42%15.00%-6.33%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
2.20%6.63%5.99%7.48%-7.03%24.78%7.21%26.64%-0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between HDMV and KNG is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018

0.64

The correlation between HDMV and KNG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

HDMV vs. KNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HDMV
KNG

Financial Services

24.4%
12.7%

Industrials

15.2%
20.3%

Utilities

14.6%
6.1%

Real Estate

13.8%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

13.0%
23.5%

Communication Services

9.4%

-

Healthcare

3.1%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

2.7%
5.5%

Energy

1.8%
3.0%

Basic Materials

1.0%
10.2%

Technology

0.9%
4.3%

Financial Services

HDMV
24.4%
KNG
12.7%

Industrials

HDMV
15.2%
KNG
20.3%

Utilities

HDMV
14.6%
KNG
6.1%

Real Estate

HDMV
13.8%
KNG
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

HDMV
13.0%
KNG
23.5%

Communication Services

HDMV
9.4%
KNG

-

Healthcare

HDMV
3.1%
KNG
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

HDMV
2.7%
KNG
5.5%

Energy

HDMV
1.8%
KNG
3.0%

Basic Materials

HDMV
1.0%
KNG
10.2%

Technology

HDMV
0.9%
KNG
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDMV vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDMV
HDMV Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
HDMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDMV Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
HDMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDMV Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

KNG
KNG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDMV vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDMVKNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.13

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

0.87

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.41

2.25

+1.16

HDMV vs. KNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the KNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDMV and KNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDMVKNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

0.73

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.32

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.49

-0.09

Drawdowns

HDMV vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDMV drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, smaller than the maximum KNG drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDMV and KNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDMVKNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.01%

-35.12%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-8.61%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.33%

-14.24%

+3.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.11%

-18.20%

-5.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.05%

-5.89%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-4.13%

-2.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

3.32%

-0.52%

Volatility

HDMV vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) at 2.29%. This indicates that HDMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDMVKNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

2.29%

+1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.38%

7.39%

+1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.16%

10.19%

+0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.05%

13.59%

-1.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.24%

17.18%

-3.94%

HDMV vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDMV has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDMV vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison

HDMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, less than KNG's 8.67% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HDMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF
4.70%5.09%3.24%3.14%3.53%3.11%1.45%3.63%2.88%3.23%0.18%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.67%8.61%9.08%5.91%4.00%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDMV and KNG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDMV has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to KNG (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDMV dropped -32.01% vs KNG's -35.12%.

On 5-year performance, HDMV leads with 6.31% vs 4.31% for KNG. On fees, KNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, KNG has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HDMV has performed better with a 6.31% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for HDMV.

KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.67%, compared with 4.70% for HDMV.

HDMV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while KNG is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for HDMV and 0.75% for KNG.

HDMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDMV and KNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer