HDMV vs. FOCT
HDMV (First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF) and FOCT (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - HDMV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while FOCT is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by FT Vest. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HDMV returned 6.68%/yr vs 9.26%/yr for FOCT. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HDMV charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FOCT.
Performance
HDMV vs. FOCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDMV achieves a 4.93% return, which is significantly lower than FOCT's 6.89% return.
HDMV
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- YTD
- 4.93%
- 6M
- 6.73%
- 1Y
- 9.31%
- 3Y*
- 12.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.68%
- 10Y*
- —
FOCT
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 2.58%
- YTD
- 6.89%
- 6M
- 7.55%
- 1Y
- 20.99%
- 3Y*
- 12.86%
- 5Y*
- 9.26%
- 10Y*
- —
HDMV vs. FOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF | 4.93% | 29.31% | 2.99% | 9.62% | -11.47% | 7.39% | 6.59% |
FOCT FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October | 6.89% | 14.92% | 9.62% | 17.81% | -7.59% | 13.13% | 6.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDMV and FOCT is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2020 | 0.59 |
The correlation between HDMV and FOCT shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (3 years) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HDMV vs. FOCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDMV
FOCT
Financial Services
Industrials
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Financial Services
HDMV
FOCT
Industrials
HDMV
FOCT
Utilities
HDMV
FOCT
Real Estate
HDMV
FOCT
Consumer Defensive
HDMV
FOCT
Communication Services
HDMV
FOCT
Healthcare
HDMV
FOCT
Consumer Cyclical
HDMV
FOCT
Energy
HDMV
FOCT
Basic Materials
HDMV
FOCT
Technology
HDMV
FOCT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDMV vs. FOCT — Risk / Return Rank
HDMV
FOCT
HDMV vs. FOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October (FOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDMV | FOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.84 | 2.64 | -1.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.20 | 3.79 | -2.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.52 | -0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 3.70 | -2.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.80 | 18.23 | -14.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDMV | FOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 2.64 | -1.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.84 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.98 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
HDMV vs. FOCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDMV drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, which is greater than FOCT's maximum drawdown of -14.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDMV and FOCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDMV | FOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.01% | -14.07% | -17.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | -5.74% | -2.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.33% | -13.06% | +2.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.11% | -14.07% | -10.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.41% | 0.00% | -5.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.77% | -2.25% | -4.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 1.16% | +1.61% |
Volatility
HDMV vs. FOCT - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October (FOCT) at 1.24%. This indicates that HDMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDMV | FOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.08% | 1.24% | +2.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.38% | 5.95% | +3.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.19% | 7.99% | +3.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.05% | 11.07% | +0.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.24% | 10.89% | +2.35% |
HDMV vs. FOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDMV has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than FOCT's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDMV vs. FOCT - Dividend Comparison
HDMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, while FOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOCT FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HDMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF | 4.67% | 5.09% | 3.24% | 3.14% | 3.53% | 3.11% | 1.45% | 3.63% | 2.88% | 3.23% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDMV and FOCT have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDMV has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to FOCT (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDMV dropped -32.01% vs FOCT's -14.07%.
On 5-year performance, FOCT leads with 9.26% vs 6.68% for HDMV. On fees, HDMV is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, FOCT has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FOCT has performed better with a 9.26% return vs 6.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDMV is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FOCT.
HDMV has the higher dividend yield at 4.67%, compared with 0.00% for FOCT.
HDMV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FOCT is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for HDMV and 0.85% for FOCT.
FOCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDMV and FOCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer