PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDMV vs. FOCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDMV vs. FOCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October (FOCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDMV achieves a 4.93% return, which is significantly lower than FOCT's 6.89% return.


HDMV

1D
0.18%
1M
-2.26%
YTD
4.93%
6M
6.73%
1Y
9.31%
3Y*
12.88%
5Y*
6.68%
10Y*

FOCT

1D
0.03%
1M
2.58%
YTD
6.89%
6M
7.55%
1Y
20.99%
3Y*
12.86%
5Y*
9.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDMV vs. FOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HDMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF
4.93%29.31%2.99%9.62%-11.47%7.39%6.59%
FOCT
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October
6.89%14.92%9.62%17.81%-7.59%13.13%6.38%

Correlation

The correlation between HDMV and FOCT is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2020

0.59

The correlation between HDMV and FOCT shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (3 years) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HDMV vs. FOCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HDMV
FOCT

Financial Services

24.4%
11.9%

Industrials

15.2%
8.1%

Utilities

14.6%
2.3%

Real Estate

13.8%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

13.0%
4.9%

Communication Services

9.4%
10.9%

Healthcare

3.1%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

2.7%
10.1%

Energy

1.8%
3.5%

Basic Materials

1.0%
1.8%

Technology

0.9%
36.2%

Financial Services

HDMV
24.4%
FOCT
11.9%

Industrials

HDMV
15.2%
FOCT
8.1%

Utilities

HDMV
14.6%
FOCT
2.3%

Real Estate

HDMV
13.8%
FOCT
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

HDMV
13.0%
FOCT
4.9%

Communication Services

HDMV
9.4%
FOCT
10.9%

Healthcare

HDMV
3.1%
FOCT
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

HDMV
2.7%
FOCT
10.1%

Energy

HDMV
1.8%
FOCT
3.5%

Basic Materials

HDMV
1.0%
FOCT
1.8%

Technology

HDMV
0.9%
FOCT
36.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDMV vs. FOCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDMV
HDMV Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
HDMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDMV Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
HDMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDMV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

FOCT
FOCT Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDMV vs. FOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October (FOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDMVFOCTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.84

2.64

-1.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.20

3.79

-2.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.52

-0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

3.70

-2.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.80

18.23

-14.43

HDMV vs. FOCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the FOCT Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDMV and FOCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDMVFOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

2.64

-1.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.84

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.98

-0.57

Drawdowns

HDMV vs. FOCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDMV drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, which is greater than FOCT's maximum drawdown of -14.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDMV and FOCT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDMVFOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.01%

-14.07%

-17.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-5.74%

-2.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.33%

-13.06%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.11%

-14.07%

-10.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.41%

0.00%

-5.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-2.25%

-4.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

1.16%

+1.61%

Volatility

HDMV vs. FOCT - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October (FOCT) at 1.24%. This indicates that HDMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDMVFOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

1.24%

+2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.38%

5.95%

+3.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.19%

7.99%

+3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.05%

11.07%

+0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.24%

10.89%

+2.35%

HDMV vs. FOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDMV has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than FOCT's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDMV vs. FOCT - Dividend Comparison

HDMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, while FOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FOCT
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HDMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF
4.67%5.09%3.24%3.14%3.53%3.11%1.45%3.63%2.88%3.23%0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDMV and FOCT have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDMV has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to FOCT (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDMV dropped -32.01% vs FOCT's -14.07%.

On 5-year performance, FOCT leads with 9.26% vs 6.68% for HDMV. On fees, HDMV is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, FOCT has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FOCT has performed better with a 9.26% return vs 6.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HDMV is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FOCT.

HDMV has the higher dividend yield at 4.67%, compared with 0.00% for FOCT.

HDMV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FOCT is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for HDMV and 0.85% for FOCT.

FOCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDMV and FOCT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer