KNG vs. NOBL
Compare and contrast key facts about FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL).
KNG and NOBL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KNG is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. It was launched on Mar 26, 2018. NOBL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013. Both KNG and NOBL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KNG or NOBL.
Correlation
The correlation between KNG and NOBL is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
KNG vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
KNG:
0.96
NOBL:
0.95
KNG:
1.37
NOBL:
1.37
KNG:
1.17
NOBL:
1.17
KNG:
1.21
NOBL:
1.25
KNG:
4.06
NOBL:
3.89
KNG:
2.16%
NOBL:
2.50%
KNG:
9.17%
NOBL:
10.26%
KNG:
-35.12%
NOBL:
-35.43%
KNG:
-6.41%
NOBL:
-7.11%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KNG achieves a 6.60% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 7.38% return.
KNG
6.60%
-3.75%
3.34%
7.79%
7.36%
N/A
NOBL
7.38%
-4.11%
4.12%
8.64%
8.12%
9.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KNG vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
KNG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KNG vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KNG vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
KNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.78%, more than NOBL's 1.45% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 9.03% | 5.91% | 4.01% | 3.45% | 3.62% | 4.09% | 3.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 1.45% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% | 1.60% | 0.30% |
Drawdowns
KNG vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KNG drawdown since its inception was -35.12%, roughly equal to the maximum NOBL drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNG and NOBL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KNG vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) is 3.27%, while ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) has a volatility of 3.48%. This indicates that KNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.