HDMV vs. DYNF
HDMV (First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF) and DYNF (iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HDMV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while DYNF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HDMV returned 6.57%/yr vs 14.71%/yr for DYNF. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HDMV charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for DYNF.
Performance
HDMV vs. DYNF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDMV achieves a 5.07% return, which is significantly lower than DYNF's 10.04% return.
HDMV
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- YTD
- 5.07%
- 6M
- 4.77%
- 1Y
- 10.89%
- 3Y*
- 13.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.57%
- 10Y*
- —
DYNF
- 1D
- -1.62%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 10.04%
- 6M
- 8.91%
- 1Y
- 27.42%
- 3Y*
- 25.19%
- 5Y*
- 14.71%
- 10Y*
- —
HDMV vs. DYNF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF | 5.07% | 29.31% | 2.99% | 9.62% | -11.47% | 7.39% | -9.42% | 5.44% |
DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | 10.04% | 20.00% | 30.29% | 36.25% | -20.27% | 22.12% | 13.47% | 14.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDMV and DYNF is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019 | 0.63 |
The correlation between HDMV and DYNF shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (3 years) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HDMV vs. DYNF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDMV
DYNF
Financial Services
Industrials
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Financial Services
HDMV
DYNF
Industrials
HDMV
DYNF
Utilities
HDMV
DYNF
Real Estate
HDMV
DYNF
Consumer Defensive
HDMV
DYNF
Communication Services
HDMV
DYNF
Healthcare
HDMV
DYNF
Consumer Cyclical
HDMV
DYNF
Energy
HDMV
DYNF
Basic Materials
HDMV
DYNF
Technology
HDMV
DYNF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDMV vs. DYNF — Risk / Return Rank
HDMV
DYNF
HDMV vs. DYNF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) and iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HDMV | DYNF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.37 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 3.18 | -1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.60 | 14.86 | -11.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HDMV vs. DYNF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDMV drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, smaller than the maximum DYNF drawdown of -34.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDMV and DYNF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDMV | DYNF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.01% | -34.72% | +2.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | -8.67% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.33% | -18.70% | +8.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.11% | -28.65% | +4.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.29% | -1.97% | -3.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.76% | -5.94% | -0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 1.85% | +1.18% |
Volatility
HDMV vs. DYNF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) is 3.43%, while iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that HDMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DYNF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDMV | DYNF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.43% | 5.38% | -1.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.71% | 10.64% | -0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.42% | 13.24% | -1.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.08% | 17.62% | -5.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.23% | 19.91% | -6.68% |
HDMV vs. DYNF - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDMV has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than DYNF's 0.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDMV vs. DYNF - Dividend Comparison
HDMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than DYNF's 0.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | 0.81% | 1.01% | 0.65% | 1.11% | 1.66% | 2.89% | 1.52% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HDMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF | 4.66% | 5.09% | 3.24% | 3.14% | 3.53% | 3.11% | 1.45% | 3.63% | 2.88% | 3.23% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDMV and DYNF have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DYNF has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to HDMV (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDMV dropped -32.01% vs DYNF's -34.72%.
On 5-year performance, DYNF leads with 14.71% vs 6.57% for HDMV. On fees, DYNF is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, HDMV has been the lower-risk option at 3.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DYNF has performed better with a 14.71% return vs 6.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DYNF is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for HDMV.
HDMV has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 0.81% for DYNF.
HDMV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DYNF is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for HDMV and 0.26% for DYNF.
DYNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDMV and DYNF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer