PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDMV vs. BKGI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDMV vs. BKGI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDMV achieves a 12.25% return, which is significantly lower than BKGI's 14.23% return.


HDMV

1D
-0.84%
1M
4.22%
6M
7.64%
YTD
12.25%
1Y
17.95%
3Y*
15.03%
5Y*
7.68%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.03%

BKGI

1D
-0.29%
1M
1.55%
6M
8.99%
YTD
14.23%
1Y
20.08%
3Y*
21.24%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$18.95M$14.99M$11.61M
$25.47K$20.31K$24.94K

HDMV vs. BKGI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HDMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF
12.25%29.31%2.99%9.62%11.06%
BKGI
Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF
14.23%37.53%12.35%9.72%8.54%

Correlation

The correlation between HDMV and BKGI is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2022

0.68

The correlation between HDMV and BKGI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

HDMV vs. BKGI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HDMV
BKGI

Financial Services

25.1%

-

Industrials

15.6%
11.5%

Utilities

14.1%
46.0%

Consumer Defensive

13.6%

-

Real Estate

13.5%
19.0%

Communication Services

8.7%
2.5%

Healthcare

3.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

2.8%

-

Energy

1.6%
21.1%

Basic Materials

1.1%

-

Technology

0.9%

-

Financial Services

HDMV
25.1%
BKGI

-

Industrials

HDMV
15.6%
BKGI
11.5%

Utilities

HDMV
14.1%
BKGI
46.0%

Consumer Defensive

HDMV
13.6%
BKGI

-

Real Estate

HDMV
13.5%
BKGI
19.0%

Communication Services

HDMV
8.7%
BKGI
2.5%

Healthcare

HDMV
3.2%
BKGI

-

Consumer Cyclical

HDMV
2.8%
BKGI

-

Energy

HDMV
1.6%
BKGI
21.1%

Basic Materials

HDMV
1.1%
BKGI

-

Technology

HDMV
0.9%
BKGI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDMV vs. BKGI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HDMV
HDMV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
HDMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDMV Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
HDMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDMV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

BKGI
BKGI Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
BKGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKGI Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
BKGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKGI Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HDMV vs. BKGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HDMVBKGIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.32

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

3.38

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.07

10.08

-4.01

HDMV vs. BKGI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDMV Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the BKGI Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDMV and BKGI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HDMV vs. BKGI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDMV drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, which is greater than BKGI's maximum drawdown of -14.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDMV and BKGI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDMVBKGIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.01%

-14.79%

-17.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-6.16%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.33%

-11.37%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-1.78%

+0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.71%

-2.54%

-4.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

2.06%

+1.04%

Volatility

HDMV vs. BKGI - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) have volatilities of 3.09% and 3.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDMVBKGIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.09%

3.04%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.95%

9.55%

+0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.56%

11.58%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.10%

13.95%

-1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.21%

13.95%

-0.74%

HDMV vs. BKGI - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDMV has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BKGI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDMV vs. BKGI - Dividend Comparison

HDMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, more than BKGI's 2.89% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BKGI
Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF
2.89%2.65%4.55%4.55%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HDMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF
3.97%5.09%3.24%3.14%3.53%3.11%1.45%3.63%2.88%3.23%0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDMV and BKGI have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDMV has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to BKGI (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDMV dropped -32.01% vs BKGI's -14.79%.

On 3-year performance, BKGI leads with 21.24% vs 15.03% for HDMV. On fees, BKGI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BKGI has performed better with a 21.24% return vs 15.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKGI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for HDMV.

HDMV has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 2.89% for BKGI.

HDMV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BKGI is Infrastructure Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for HDMV and 0.65% for BKGI.

BKGI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDMV and BKGI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer