HDMV vs. BKGI
HDMV (First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF) and BKGI (Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HDMV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while BKGI is a Infrastructure Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HDMV returned 15.03%/yr vs 21.24%/yr for BKGI. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HDMV charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BKGI.
Performance
HDMV vs. BKGI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDMV achieves a 12.25% return, which is significantly lower than BKGI's 14.23% return.
HDMV
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- 6M
- 7.64%
- YTD
- 12.25%
- 1Y
- 17.95%
- 3Y*
- 15.03%
- 5Y*
- 7.68%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.03%
BKGI
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 8.99%
- YTD
- 14.23%
- 1Y
- 20.08%
- 3Y*
- 21.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 21.98%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $18.95M | $14.99M | $11.61M | |
| $25.47K | $20.31K | $24.94K |
HDMV vs. BKGI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF | 12.25% | 29.31% | 2.99% | 9.62% | 11.06% |
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF | 14.23% | 37.53% | 12.35% | 9.72% | 8.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDMV and BKGI is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2022 | 0.68 |
The correlation between HDMV and BKGI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
HDMV vs. BKGI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDMV
BKGI
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
HDMV
BKGI
-
Industrials
HDMV
BKGI
Utilities
HDMV
BKGI
Consumer Defensive
HDMV
BKGI
-
Real Estate
HDMV
BKGI
Communication Services
HDMV
BKGI
Healthcare
HDMV
BKGI
-
Consumer Cyclical
HDMV
BKGI
-
Energy
HDMV
BKGI
Basic Materials
HDMV
BKGI
-
Technology
HDMV
BKGI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDMV vs. BKGI — Risk / Return Rank
HDMV
BKGI
HDMV vs. BKGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HDMV | BKGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.32 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 3.38 | -1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.07 | 10.08 | -4.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HDMV vs. BKGI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDMV drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, which is greater than BKGI's maximum drawdown of -14.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDMV and BKGI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDMV | BKGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.01% | -14.79% | -17.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | -6.16% | -2.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.33% | -11.37% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -1.78% | +0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.71% | -2.54% | -4.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 2.06% | +1.04% |
Volatility
HDMV vs. BKGI - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) have volatilities of 3.09% and 3.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDMV | BKGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.09% | 3.04% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | 9.55% | +0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.56% | 11.58% | -0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.10% | 13.95% | -1.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.21% | 13.95% | -0.74% |
HDMV vs. BKGI - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDMV has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BKGI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDMV vs. BKGI - Dividend Comparison
HDMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, more than BKGI's 2.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF | 2.89% | 2.65% | 4.55% | 4.55% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HDMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF | 3.97% | 5.09% | 3.24% | 3.14% | 3.53% | 3.11% | 1.45% | 3.63% | 2.88% | 3.23% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDMV and BKGI have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDMV has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to BKGI (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDMV dropped -32.01% vs BKGI's -14.79%.
On 3-year performance, BKGI leads with 21.24% vs 15.03% for HDMV. On fees, BKGI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BKGI has performed better with a 21.24% return vs 15.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKGI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for HDMV.
HDMV has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 2.89% for BKGI.
HDMV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BKGI is Infrastructure Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for HDMV and 0.65% for BKGI.
BKGI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDMV and BKGI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer