HBI vs. GCOW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HBI (Hanesbrands Inc.) is a stock, while GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) is Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. Over the past 10 years, HBI returned -11.25%/yr vs 9.91%/yr for GCOW. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HBI vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, HBI has underperformed GCOW with an annualized return of -11.25%, while GCOW has yielded a comparatively higher 9.91% annualized return.

HBI

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 31.77%
• 3Y*: 13.71%
• 5Y*: -18.46%
• 10Y*: -11.25%

GCOW

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: 12.18%
• 6M: 13.23%
• 1Y: 27.12%
• 3Y*: 17.41%
• 5Y*: 12.34%
• 10Y*: 9.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBI vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HBI Hanesbrands Inc.	0.00%	-20.52%	82.51%	-29.87%	-59.62%	18.43%	3.22%	22.90%	-38.04%	-0.28%
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	12.18%	27.34%	3.52%	13.95%	5.49%	14.58%	-4.33%	17.81%	-7.99%	20.71%

Correlation

The correlation between HBI and GCOW is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016	0.43

Return for Risk

HBI vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBI

HBI Risk / Return Rank: 79
HBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
HBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
HBI Omega Ratio Rank: 87
HBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
HBI Martin Ratio Rank: 78

GCOW

GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 79
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 72
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBI vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HBI	GCOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	2.52	-1.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	3.63	-1.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.44	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.20	5.71	-3.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.96	15.05	-9.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HBI vs. GCOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBI Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the GCOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBI and GCOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HBI	GCOW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	2.52	-1.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.39	0.92	-1.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.24	0.61	-0.86
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.59	-0.53

Drawdowns

HBI vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBI drawdown since its inception was -86.52%, which is greater than GCOW's maximum drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBI and GCOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	HBI	GCOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.52%	-37.64%	-48.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.60%	-4.77%	-13.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-54.32%	-12.35%	-41.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-81.52%	-21.48%	-60.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-83.66%	-37.64%	-46.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-75.57%	-2.73%	-72.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.67%	-5.84%	-31.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.62%	1.81%	+11.81%

Volatility

HBI vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI) is 0.00%, while Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) has a volatility of 2.85%. This indicates that HBI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HBI	GCOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	2.85%	-2.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.47%	7.99%	+1.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.32%	10.81%	+29.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.75%	13.49%	+36.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.05%	16.20%	+30.85%

Dividends

HBI vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

HBI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	4.43%	4.06%	5.14%	5.28%	4.39%	4.23%	4.12%	4.40%	3.94%	2.79%	1.95%	0.00%
HBI Hanesbrands Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	9.43%	3.59%	4.12%	4.04%	4.79%	2.87%	2.04%	11.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HBI and GCOW in my portfolio?

HBI and GCOW have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HBI or GCOW?

GCOW has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to HBI (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HBI dropped -86.52% vs GCOW's -37.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.