PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HBI vs. EBF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HBI vs. EBF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI) and Ennis, Inc. (EBF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, HBI has underperformed EBF with an annualized return of -11.25%, while EBF has yielded a comparatively higher 7.89% annualized return.


HBI

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
34.23%
3Y*
13.71%
5Y*
-18.58%
10Y*
-11.25%

EBF

1D
0.63%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
18.04%
6M
20.79%
1Y
18.22%
3Y*
9.67%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*
7.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBI vs. EBF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HBI
Hanesbrands Inc.
0.00%-20.52%82.51%-29.87%-59.62%18.43%3.22%22.90%-38.04%-0.28%
EBF
Ennis, Inc.
18.04%-9.96%12.59%3.64%19.38%14.78%-13.46%17.54%-2.77%24.65%

Correlation

The correlation between HBI and EBF is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2006

0.36

Fundamentals

EPS

HBI:

$0.93

EBF:

$2.44

PE Ratio

HBI:

6.99

EBF:

8.48

PEG Ratio

HBI:

0.04

EBF:

0.50

PS Ratio

HBI:

0.67

EBF:

1.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

HBI:

$3.44B

EBF:

$296.04M

Gross Profit (TTM)

HBI:

$1.44B

EBF:

$92.28M

EBITDA (TTM)

HBI:

$443.84M

EBF:

$75.72M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HBI vs. EBF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBI
HBI Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
HBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBI Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
HBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBI Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

EBF
EBF Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
EBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBF Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
EBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBF Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBI vs. EBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI) and Ennis, Inc. (EBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HBIEBFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.09

0.84

+0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.68

1.23

+1.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.16

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.22

1.50

-1.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.50

3.58

-3.08

HBI vs. EBF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBI Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the EBF Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBI and EBF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HBIEBFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

0.84

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.39

0.33

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.24

0.30

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.19

-0.13

Drawdowns

HBI vs. EBF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBI drawdown since its inception was -86.52%, which is greater than EBF's maximum drawdown of -73.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBI and EBF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HBIEBFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.52%

-73.10%

-13.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.60%

-11.41%

-7.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.32%

-22.80%

-31.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.52%

-22.80%

-58.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.66%

-35.32%

-48.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-75.57%

-6.24%

-69.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.66%

-20.58%

-17.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.26%

4.77%

+9.49%

Volatility

HBI vs. EBF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI) is 0.00%, while Ennis, Inc. (EBF) has a volatility of 5.52%. This indicates that HBI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EBF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HBIEBFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

5.52%

-5.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.59%

16.11%

-6.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.44%

21.84%

+18.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.75%

21.36%

+28.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.06%

26.25%

+20.81%

Dividends

HBI vs. EBF - Dividend Comparison

HBI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EBF
Ennis, Inc.
4.82%5.55%16.60%4.56%4.51%4.86%5.04%4.16%4.94%3.61%11.67%3.64%
HBI
Hanesbrands Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%9.43%3.59%4.12%4.04%4.79%2.87%2.04%11.55%

Financials

HBI vs. EBF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hanesbrands Inc. and Ennis, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
891.68M
0
(HBI) Total Revenue
(EBF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


HBI and EBF have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EBF has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to HBI (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HBI dropped -86.52% vs EBF's -73.10%.

HBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HBI and EBF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer