HBI vs. VFC

In the year-to-date period, HBI achieves a -40.66% return, which is significantly higher than VFC's -46.67% return. Over the past 10 years, HBI has underperformed VFC with an annualized return of -14.84%, while VFC has yielded a comparatively higher -14.06% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI) and V.F. Corporation (VFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current HBI Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is higher than the VFC Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBI and VFC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

HBI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%.

The maximum HBI drawdown since its inception was -86.52%, roughly equal to the maximum VFC drawdown of -88.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBI and VFC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI) is 26.35%, while V.F. Corporation (VFC) has a volatility of 46.89%. This indicates that HBI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hanesbrands Inc. and V.F. Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.