HBI vs. LIND

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

HBI (Hanesbrands Inc.) and LIND (Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — HBI in Apparel Manufacturing, LIND in Travel Services. Over the past 10 years, HBI returned -11.25%/yr vs 8.76%/yr for LIND. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HBI vs. LIND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI) and Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. (LIND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, HBI has underperformed LIND with an annualized return of -11.25%, while LIND has yielded a comparatively higher 8.76% annualized return.

HBI

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 34.23%
• 3Y*: 13.71%
• 5Y*: -18.58%
• 10Y*: -11.25%

LIND

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: 22.37%
• YTD: 57.42%
• 6M: 92.37%
• 1Y: 115.57%
• 3Y*: 30.14%
• 5Y*: 5.55%
• 10Y*: 8.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBI vs. LIND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HBI Hanesbrands Inc.	0.00%	-20.52%	82.51%	-29.87%	-59.62%	18.43%	3.22%	22.90%	-38.04%	-0.28%
LIND Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.	57.42%	21.59%	5.24%	46.36%	-50.64%	-8.88%	4.71%	21.47%	37.49%	3.60%

Correlation

The correlation between HBI and LIND is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2015	0.31

Fundamentals

Market Cap HBI : $2.31B LIND : $1.39B
EPS HBI : $0.93 LIND : -$0.43
PS Ratio HBI : 0.67 LIND : 2.17
Total Revenue (TTM) HBI : $3.44B LIND : $591.30M
Gross Profit (TTM) HBI : $1.44B LIND : $203.31M
EBITDA (TTM) HBI : $443.84M LIND : $71.33M

Return for Risk

HBI vs. LIND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBI

HBI Risk / Return Rank: 67
HBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
HBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
HBI Omega Ratio Rank: 88
HBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
HBI Martin Ratio Rank: 46

LIND

LIND Risk / Return Rank: 89
LIND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
LIND Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
LIND Omega Ratio Rank: 86
LIND Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
LIND Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBI vs. LIND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI) and Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. (LIND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HBI	LIND	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	2.39	-1.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	3.19	-0.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.38	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.22	4.91	-4.69
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.50	10.11	-9.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HBI vs. LIND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBI Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the LIND Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBI and LIND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HBI	LIND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.09	2.39	-1.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.39	0.08	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.24	0.14	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.12	-0.06

Drawdowns

HBI vs. LIND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBI drawdown since its inception was -86.52%, roughly equal to the maximum LIND drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBI and LIND.

Drawdown Indicators

	HBI	LIND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.52%	-83.16%	-3.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.60%	-23.67%	+5.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-54.32%	-50.93%	-3.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-81.52%	-68.75%	-12.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-83.66%	-83.16%	-0.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-75.57%	-1.22%	-74.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.66%	-30.04%	-7.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.26%	11.50%	+2.76%

Volatility

HBI vs. LIND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI) is 0.00%, while Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. (LIND) has a volatility of 21.10%. This indicates that HBI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HBI	LIND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	21.10%	-21.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.59%	37.85%	-28.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.44%	48.58%	-8.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.75%	66.51%	-16.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.06%	62.17%	-15.11%

Dividends

HBI vs. LIND - Dividend Comparison

Neither HBI nor LIND has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HBI Hanesbrands Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	9.43%	3.59%	4.12%	4.04%	4.79%	2.87%	2.04%	11.55%
LIND Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HBI and LIND in my portfolio?

HBI and LIND have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HBI or LIND?

LIND has higher volatility (21.10%) compared to HBI (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HBI dropped -86.52% vs LIND's -83.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.