HAL vs. BKNG
HAL (Halliburton Company) and BKNG (Booking Holdings Inc.) are both stocks. HAL operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while BKNG operates in Travel Services (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, HAL returned 0.88%/yr vs 12.44%/yr for BKNG. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HAL vs. BKNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAL achieves a 41.41% return, which is significantly higher than BKNG's -22.63% return. Over the past 10 years, HAL has underperformed BKNG with an annualized return of 0.88%, while BKNG has yielded a comparatively higher 12.44% annualized return.
HAL
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -3.05%
- YTD
- 41.41%
- 6M
- 39.63%
- 1Y
- 84.34%
- 3Y*
- 9.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.63%
- 10Y*
- 0.88%
BKNG
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 6.66%
- YTD
- -22.63%
- 6M
- -21.85%
- 1Y
- -23.87%
- 3Y*
- 17.23%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
HAL vs. BKNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAL Halliburton Company | 41.41% | 7.02% | -23.19% | -6.47% | 74.45% | 21.99% | -21.23% | -4.90% | -44.63% | -8.18% |
BKNG Booking Holdings Inc. | -22.63% | 8.59% | 41.31% | 76.02% | -16.00% | 7.72% | 8.45% | 19.24% | -0.88% | 18.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAL and BKNG is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 1999 | 0.26 |
The correlation between HAL and BKNG shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.27 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HAL:
$33.22B
BKNG:
$130.96B
HAL:
$1.82
BKNG:
$7.60
HAL:
21.80
BKNG:
21.71
HAL:
3.48
BKNG:
0.32
HAL:
1.51
BKNG:
4.82
HAL:
$22.17B
BKNG:
$27.69B
HAL:
$3.40B
BKNG:
$22.16B
HAL:
$3.83B
BKNG:
$9.27B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAL vs. BKNG — Risk / Return Rank
HAL
BKNG
HAL vs. BKNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Halliburton Company (HAL) and Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HAL | BKNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 0.89 | +0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.47 | -0.72 | +7.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.47 | -1.36 | +17.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HAL vs. BKNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAL drawdown since its inception was -92.99%, smaller than the maximum BKNG drawdown of -99.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAL and BKNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAL | BKNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.99% | -99.32% | +6.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.10% | -33.35% | +20.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.01% | -33.35% | -20.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.01% | -39.53% | -14.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.45% | -47.77% | -43.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.89% | -28.50% | -4.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.12% | -47.05% | +7.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.14% | 17.53% | -12.39% |
Volatility
HAL vs. BKNG - Volatility Comparison
Halliburton Company (HAL) has a higher volatility of 9.32% compared to Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) at 6.54%. This indicates that HAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAL | BKNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.32% | 6.54% | +2.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.13% | 26.83% | -2.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.76% | 31.94% | +4.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.18% | 32.26% | +7.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.96% | 32.45% | +13.51% |
Dividends
HAL vs. BKNG - Dividend Comparison
HAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, more than BKNG's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKNG Booking Holdings Inc. | 0.97% | 0.72% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HAL Halliburton Company | 1.72% | 2.41% | 2.50% | 1.77% | 1.22% | 0.79% | 1.67% | 2.94% | 2.71% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 2.12% |
Financials
HAL vs. BKNG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Halliburton Company and Booking Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HAL vs. BKNG - Profitability Comparison
HAL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported a gross profit of 790.00M and revenue of 5.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.6%.
BKNG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booking Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
HAL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported an operating income of 679.00M and revenue of 5.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.
BKNG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booking Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 1.27B and revenue of 5.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.0%.
HAL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported a net income of 461.00M and revenue of 5.40B, resulting in a net margin of 8.5%.
BKNG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booking Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 1.08B and revenue of 5.53B, resulting in a net margin of 19.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HAL and BKNG have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HAL has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to BKNG (6.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAL dropped -92.99% vs BKNG's -99.32%.
HAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HAL and BKNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer