BKNG vs. BEDZ
BKNG (Booking Holdings Inc.) is a stock, while BEDZ (AdvisorShares Hotel ETF) is Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Over the past 5 years, BKNG returned 18.73%/yr vs 11.88%/yr for BEDZ. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
BKNG vs. BEDZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKNG achieves a -9.61% return, which is significantly lower than BEDZ's 12.58% return.
BKNG
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- 6M
- -5.49%
- YTD
- -9.61%
- 1Y
- -9.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.11%
- 5Y*
- 18.73%
- 10Y*
- 13.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.13%
BEDZ
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- 6M
- 12.82%
- YTD
- 12.58%
- 1Y
- 19.65%
- 3Y*
- 14.99%
- 5Y*
- 11.88%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.25%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $41.69K | $47.62K | $77.24K | |
| $1.15B | $1.06B | $1.30B |
BKNG vs. BEDZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKNG Booking Holdings Inc. | -9.61% | 8.59% | 41.31% | 76.02% | -16.00% | 2.31% |
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF | 12.58% | 3.46% | 18.31% | 23.88% | -13.40% | 7.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKNG and BEDZ is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021 | 0.68 |
The correlation between BKNG and BEDZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKNG vs. BEDZ — Risk / Return Rank
BKNG
BEDZ
BKNG vs. BEDZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) and AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BKNG | BEDZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.18 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | 1.64 | -1.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.54 | 3.88 | -4.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKNG vs. BEDZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKNG drawdown since its inception was -99.32%, which is greater than BEDZ's maximum drawdown of -29.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKNG and BEDZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKNG | BEDZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.32% | -29.70% | -69.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.25% | -12.06% | -20.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.35% | -28.31% | -5.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.53% | -29.70% | -9.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.46% | -1.84% | -14.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.92% | -7.88% | -39.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.12% | 5.07% | +13.05% |
Volatility
BKNG vs. BEDZ - Volatility Comparison
Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) has a higher volatility of 12.72% compared to AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) at 5.38%. This indicates that BKNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BEDZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKNG | BEDZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.72% | 5.38% | +7.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.76% | 15.13% | +15.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.35% | 20.29% | +15.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.91% | 24.60% | +8.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.59% | 24.65% | +7.94% |
Dividends
BKNG vs. BEDZ - Dividend Comparison
BKNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than BEDZ's 2.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF | 2.05% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 1.67% | 0.21% | 0.36% |
BKNG Booking Holdings Inc. | 0.83% | 0.72% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKNG and BEDZ have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BKNG has higher volatility (12.72%) compared to BEDZ (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKNG dropped -99.32% vs BEDZ's -29.70%.
BEDZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BKNG and BEDZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer