PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPAM vs. WCBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SPAM vs. WCBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) and WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SPAM vs. WCBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SPAM
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
-5.88%4.86%10.58%5.42%
WCBR
WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund
-10.44%-1.44%11.42%6.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPAM achieves a -5.88% return, which is significantly higher than WCBR's -10.44% return.


SPAM

1D
3.78%
1M
0.69%
YTD
-5.88%
6M
-17.32%
1Y
1.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WCBR

1D
3.56%
1M
3.12%
YTD
-10.44%
6M
-20.50%
1Y
-7.95%
3Y*
10.69%
5Y*
2.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SPAM vs. WCBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPAM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than WCBR's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SPAM vs. WCBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPAM
SPAM Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
SPAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPAM Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SPAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPAM Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

WCBR
WCBR Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
WCBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCBR Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
WCBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCBR Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPAM vs. WCBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) and WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPAMWCBRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.07

-0.26

+0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.29

-0.16

+0.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.98

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.01

-0.34

+0.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.02

-0.85

+0.87

SPAM vs. WCBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPAM Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is higher than the WCBR Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPAM and WCBR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPAMWCBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

-0.26

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.01

+0.26

Correlation

The correlation between SPAM and WCBR is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SPAM vs. WCBR - Dividend Comparison

SPAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, while WCBR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021
SPAM
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
0.52%0.49%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WCBR
WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund
0.00%0.00%0.02%0.00%0.03%0.43%

Drawdowns

SPAM vs. WCBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPAM drawdown since its inception was -24.02%, smaller than the maximum WCBR drawdown of -52.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPAM and WCBR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SPAMWCBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.02%

-52.25%

+28.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.02%

-28.17%

+4.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.11%

-23.50%

+3.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.37%

-20.57%

+14.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.78%

11.20%

-1.42%

Volatility

SPAM vs. WCBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) is 8.04%, while WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) has a volatility of 10.01%. This indicates that SPAM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WCBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SPAMWCBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.04%

10.01%

-1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.15%

21.84%

-2.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.80%

30.56%

-3.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.51%

32.85%

-9.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.51%

33.00%

-9.49%