SPAM vs. CIBR

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SPAM (Themes Cybersecurity ETF) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - SPAM tracks the Solactive Cyber Security Index - Benchmark TR Net while CIBR tracks the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SPAM returned 36.26% vs 30.75% for CIBR. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPAM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.

Performance

SPAM vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPAM achieves a 37.49% return, which is significantly higher than CIBR's 32.24% return.

SPAM

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: 31.03%
• YTD: 37.49%
• 6M: 30.70%
• 1Y: 36.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIBR

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 37.17%
• YTD: 32.24%
• 6M: 29.33%
• 1Y: 30.75%
• 3Y*: 29.54%
• 5Y*: 17.20%
• 10Y*: 18.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPAM vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SPAM Themes Cybersecurity ETF	37.49%	4.86%	10.58%	5.42%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	32.24%	13.06%	18.21%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SPAM and CIBR is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2023	0.88

The correlation between SPAM and CIBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPAM vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPAM	CIBR
Technology	88.9%	94.0%
Communication Services	6.7%	2.6%
Industrials	4.0%	3.5%
Real Estate	0.5%	-
Financial Services	0.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SPAM vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPAM

SPAM Risk / Return Rank: 33
SPAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
SPAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
SPAM Omega Ratio Rank: 35
SPAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
SPAM Martin Ratio Rank: 25

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 32
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 35
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPAM vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPAM	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	1.27	+0.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	1.82	+0.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.23	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.54	1.46	+0.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.47	3.47	0.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPAM vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPAM Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPAM and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPAM	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36	1.27	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	0.68	+0.27

Drawdowns

SPAM vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPAM drawdown since its inception was -24.02%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPAM and CIBR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPAM	CIBR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.02%	-33.89%	+9.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.02%	-21.99%	-2.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.99%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.89%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.23%	0.00%	-1.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.53%	-8.66%	+2.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.69%	9.25%	+1.44%

Volatility

SPAM vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) have volatilities of 9.99% and 9.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPAM	CIBR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.99%	9.99%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.16%	20.72%	+1.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.86%	24.34%	+2.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.68%	24.93%	-0.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.68%	23.58%	+1.10%

SPAM vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPAM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPAM vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

SPAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than CIBR's 0.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.43%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%
SPAM Themes Cybersecurity ETF	0.36%	0.49%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPAM and CIBR in my portfolio?

SPAM and CIBR have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPAM or CIBR?

CIBR has higher volatility (9.99%) compared to SPAM (9.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPAM dropped -24.02% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

Which ETF is better, SPAM or CIBR?

On 1-year performance, SPAM leads with 36.26% vs 30.75% for CIBR. On fees, SPAM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPAM or CIBR?

Over the 1-year period, SPAM has performed better with a 36.26% return vs 30.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPAM or CIBR?

SPAM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPAM or CIBR?

CIBR has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.36% for SPAM.

What is the main difference between SPAM and CIBR?

SPAM tracks Solactive Cyber Security Index - Benchmark TR Net, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. They also come from different issuers: Themes and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SPAM and 0.60% for CIBR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.