PortfoliosLab logo
SPAM vs. CIBR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SPAM and CIBR is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

SPAM vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SPAM:

0.65

CIBR:

1.17

Sortino Ratio

SPAM:

1.10

CIBR:

1.70

Omega Ratio

SPAM:

1.14

CIBR:

1.23

Calmar Ratio

SPAM:

0.72

CIBR:

1.42

Martin Ratio

SPAM:

2.50

CIBR:

4.97

Ulcer Index

SPAM:

6.44%

CIBR:

5.75%

Daily Std Dev

SPAM:

24.12%

CIBR:

24.40%

Max Drawdown

SPAM:

-22.22%

CIBR:

-33.89%

Current Drawdown

SPAM:

-4.03%

CIBR:

-0.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPAM achieves a 7.84% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 13.18% return.


SPAM

YTD

7.84%

1M

14.75%

6M

7.73%

1Y

15.47%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CIBR

YTD

13.18%

1M

16.25%

6M

16.31%

1Y

28.24%

3Y*

21.46%

5Y*

19.02%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Themes Cybersecurity ETF

SPAM vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPAM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SPAM vs. CIBR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPAM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SPAM is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SPAM is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SPAM is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SPAM is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SPAM is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SPAM is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

CIBR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CIBR is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CIBR is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CIBR is 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CIBR is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CIBR is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CIBR is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SPAM vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SPAM Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPAM and CIBR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

SPAM vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

SPAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than CIBR's 0.23% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPAM
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
0.12%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
0.23%0.29%0.42%0.30%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.22%0.10%0.77%0.58%

Drawdowns

SPAM vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPAM drawdown since its inception was -22.22%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPAM and CIBR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

SPAM vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) at 4.92%. This indicates that SPAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...